Esfera lingüística y mental de una obra de arte en la cultura lingüística ucraniana y estadounidense



Palabras clave:

: narración, metadiscurso, hermeneutica, Faulkner, lingüistica, cuento, Honchar.


El objetivo del presente artículo es identificar y explorar de manera comparativa la esfera lingüística y mental de la obra literaria en la cultura lingüística ucraniana y estadounidense a partir del ejemplo de los cuentos de William Faulkner (“Two Soldiers”) y Oles Honchar (“Por un momento de felicidad”). Se utilizaron los siguientes métodos: hermenéutica, lectura minuciosa, histórico-cultural, intertextual y método comparativo. La estructura del diseño del discurso del cuento de Faulkner es clara, sin adornos artísticos adicionales; su vocabulario es conciso y cumple funciones pragmáticas más que estéticas. Asimimso, la decodificación de los marcadores verbales existentes contribuye a una comprensión más profunda del espíritu mental del texto literario. En cambio, la cosmovisión de los héroes refleja más bien rasgos de la intuición como método filosófico. El cuento de Honchar sobre las esferas lingüística y mental de la organización sufrió una fuerte influencia artística y psicologización. El formato del artículo nos permitió centrarnos más solo en el lado léxico y semántico de la esfera lingüística y mental de las obras. Se han identificado áreas potenciales de investigación adicional. Sin embargo, es necesario complementar el análisis léxico-semántico generalizando las observaciones sintáctico-estilísticas del discurso y metadiscurso de los cuentos.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.


Abbas, A. H. (2020). Politicizing the pandemic: A schemata analysis of COVID-19 news in two selected newspapers. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique.

Abood, L. B. S. (2019). The use of synecdoche in Faulkner’s A rose for Emily. Journal of Al-Qadisiya in Arts and Educational Sciences, 19 (4), 23-42.

Abrantes, A. M. (2021). From space to mental space: a cognitive perspective into narrative and the architecture of the human mind. Diffractions, 2 (3), 10-28.

AlJazrawi, D. A., & AlJazrawi, Z. A. (2019). The use of meta-discourse an analysis of interactive and interactional markers in English short stories as a type of literary genre. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8 (3), 66-77.

Barbieri, M. (2020). The semantic theory of language. Biosystems, 190, 104100.

Candria, M. (2019). Stylistics: Towards a linguistic analysis of literature. Culturalistics: Journal of Cultural, Literary, and Linguistic Studies, 3 (1), 29-34.

Carter, R., & Stockwell, P. (Eds.). (2008). The language and literature reader. London: Routledge.

Cheremskaya, O., & Maslo, O. (2018). Oles Honchar’s Kharkiv period of language creation. The culture of the word, 88, 143-156.

Chomsky, N. (2013). Lecture I: What is language? The Journal of Philosophy, 110 (12), 645-662.

Chomsky, N. (2016). Minimal computation and the architecture of language. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 12 (1), 13-24.

Conklin, K., Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Carrol, G. (2018). Eye-tracking: A guide for applied linguistics research. London: Cambridge University Press.

Curelar, M. R. O. (2019). Symbolic Meanings and Folk Beliefs in the Romanian Literature. Research and Science Today, 1, 178-186.

Explorations of Style. (2017). Metadiscourse.

Fauconnier, G. & Sweetser, E. (Eds.). (1996). Spaces, worlds, and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ferron, I. (2020). Why Humboldt now? Does his legacy live on? Odradek. Studies in Philosophy of Literature, Aesthetics, and New Media Theories, 6 (1), 11-20.

Fomenko, O. (2019). Oles Honchar and Jerome Salinger: genre constants and stylistic modifications of the twentieth century novella. Ukrainian Studies, 2 (71), 258-269.

Fomina, I. L. (2018). Determining the influence of means of expression in the process of analysis of Oles Honchar's short stories on the development of speech competence of future teachers. Young Scientist, 1 (1), 240-244.

Friederici, A. D., Chomsky, N., Berwick, R. C., Moro, A., & Bolhuis, J. J. (2017). Language, mind and brain. Nature Human Behaviour, 1 (10), 713-722.

Giordano, J. E. (2021). ‘The dark land talking the voiceless speech’: The rupture of voice and environment in William Faulkner’s ‘As I lay dying’. [Dissertation Thesis]. Haverford College.

Guy, J. M., Conklin, K., & Sanchez-Davies, J. (2018). Literary stylistics, authorial intention and the scientific study of literature: A critical overview. Language and Literature, 27 (3), 196-217.

Hart, C. (Ed.). (2019). Cognitive linguistic approaches to text and discourse: From poetics to politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Hu, T. (2015). An exemplification of American pragmatism in Benjamin Franklin's autobiography. English Language and Literature Studies, 5 (2), 117-122.

Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of pragmatics, 113, 16-29.

Hyland, K. (2018). Metadiscourse. Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2020). Text-organizing metadiscourse: Tracking changes in rhetorical persuasion. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 21 (1), 137-164.

Jebakumar, A. N. (2019). William Faulkner and his narrative in short stories. Language in India, 19 (3), 134-137.

Khakimova, S. R. (2019). Literary text and its lingua cultural features in translation. Academy, 12 (51), 67-69.

Koren, M. (2018). The three kinds of people who live in the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (2), 119-131.

Kubánek, C. (2021). Linguistic differences, differences in mind style: Corpus analysis of William Faulkner's novel As I lay dying.

Mamaraimova, O. T. (2019). The expression of national mentality in the language. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 16 (2), 134-137.

McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Personality profiles of cultures: aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (3), 407-425.

Omarov, B. Z., Salkynbayev, M. B., Kydyr, T. E., Kuldeyeva, G. I., Yeskindirova, M. Z., & Alshinbayeva, Z. (2020). Reflection of ideas about native land in poetic and prose works using narrative literature technique. Media Watch, 11 (2), 408-418.

Pederson, E. (2007). Cognitive linguistics and linguistic relativity. In: D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics.

Pietroski, P. (2021). Chomsky on meaning and reference. In: N. Allott, T. Lohndal, G. Rey (Eds), A companion to Chomsky (pp. 404-415). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Pléh, C. (2019). The inspirational role of Chomsky in the cognitive turn of psychology. Acta Linguistica Academica, 66 (3), 397-428.

Popova, O., Grushevskaya, E., Zelenskaya, V., Golubtsov, S., & Grushevskaya, T. (2019). Language, culture, society at the intersection of modern scientific disciplines. In: International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019) (pp. 58-64). Paris: Atlantis Press.

Rieger, C. (2021). An intertextual reading of William Faulkner’s “Victory”. Studies in the American Short Story, 2 (1), 73-81.

Roberts, T. (2019). The language of an exploitive economy: Centering women's narratives in William Faulkner’s The sound and the fury and Language and Loss: Modernity's reckoning with loss in William Faulkner’s “A rose for Emily”. [Doctoral dissertation], The University of North Carolina.

Rolls, H., & Rodgers, M. P. (2017). Science-specific technical vocabulary in science fiction-fantasy texts: A case for ‘language through literature’. English for Specific Purposes, 48, 44-56.

Rudner, R. S. (2019). Philosophy of science and recent research on language, mind, and brain. In: Language, Mind, and Brain (pp. 251-253). New York: Psychology Press.

Text Inspector. (2020). What Are Discourse and Metadiscourse Markers? (2022). Mentality.

Von Humboldt, W. (1971). Linguistic Variability and Intellectual Development (Miami Linguistics Series No. 9). Miami: University of Miami.

Wainwright, M. (2021). Faulkner’s ethics: An intense struggle. New York: Springer Nature.

White, L. A. (2021). Anthropology. Individuality and individualism: A culturological interpretation. In Innocence and Power (pp. 1-35). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Whiteley, S., & Canning, P. (2017). Reader response research in stylistics. Language and Literature, 26 (2), 71-87.




Cómo citar

Hurbanska, S. ., Prybluda, L. ., Konopelkina, H. ., Svyrydenko, O. ., & Rudenko, M. . (2022). Esfera lingüística y mental de una obra de arte en la cultura lingüística ucraniana y estadounidense. Apuntes Universitarios, 12(4), 142–161.