Interacción dialógica como componente de la competencia comunicativa del docente

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v11i4.855

Palabras clave:

diálogo, interacción, competencia comunicativa del docente, actividad profesional.

Resumen

Este artículo trata sobre la esencia y los detalles de la interacción dialógica como un componente de la competencia comunicativa del profesor. Destaca que la interacción dialógica es la más difundida en el proceso educativo, lo que significa que las habilidades de diálogo efectivo no solo son un elemento importante de la competencia comunicativa del docente, sino su profesionalismo en general. Por tanto, al ser una de las dimensiones más importantes de la excelencia pedagógica, requieren un desarrollo especial. En este contexto, el artículo tiene como objetivo considerar aspectos teóricos y empíricos de la mejora de la interacción dialógica como un componente de la competencia comunicativa del docente. En primer lugar, el estudio refleja un análisis teórico escrupuloso del tema, con el foco principal en la idea de que en la actividad pedagógica, la interacción dialógica domina otras formas de interacción. Luego, el artículo describe el experimento que tuvo como objetivo estudiar los detalles del desarrollo y mejora de la interacción dialógica. Los resultados del experimento permiten sacar una conclusión sobre la alta efectividad del programa formulado en la mejora de la interacción dialógica como componente de la competencia comunicativa del docente. La eficacia del uso del programa ha sido confirmada por los resultados de la práctica repetida. El proceso pedagógico en una institución educativa se basa en la interacción de personalidades. Por tanto, el devenir pedagógico de un docente está determinado por la posibilidad de que sea sujeto de la actividad pedagógica y construya una interacción dialógica con sus otros sujetos.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

Avramkova, I. S., Anufrieva, N. I., Kamyanets, A. V., Kuznetsova, E. O., & Scherbakova, A. I. (2021). Monitoring studies of university graduates’ satisfaction with the quality of education: the main approaches. Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, Araraquara, 25, 1, 638–653. http://dx.doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v25iesp.1.15004

Bermus, A.G. (2014). Pedagogical component of multi-level professional university education. Continuous education: 21st century, 1 (5). https://lll21.petrsu.ru/journal/article.php?id=2281

Bírová, J., Kružlík, P., Kalimullin, A., Sokolova, N., Haroun, Z., Králik, R., & Vasbieva, D. (2018). Mathematical and Statistical Bibliometric Indicators for Scholars in the Field of Romance Languages and Linguistics. EURASIA: Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14 (12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/97826

Blinova, S., Dugina, T., & Zabolotskikh, A. (2018). Teaching mixed nationality groups (on the example of students from the Northern Caucasus region). INTED2018: Proceedings of the 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 7977-7982). Valencia, Spain. https://library.iated.org/view/BLINOVA2018TEA

Chung, C., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). The psychological functions of function. Social communication, 1, 343-359. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-01308-012

Dolzhich, E., & Dmitrichenkova, S. (2018). Computer science terminology (a case study of the Spanish language). In INTED2018: Proceedings of the 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 2556-2559). Valencia, Spain. https://library.iated.org/view/DOLZHICH2018COM

Ephimova, D. V., & Makarov, Y. A. (2014). Dialogue: a possibility to reach axiological unity in cross-cultural interaction. The 21st century: results of the past and problems of the present, 4, 97-102. https://vek21.penzgtu.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2014_20.pdf

Erofeeva, A. V., & Perfilieva, E. I. (2012). Theory and practice of pedagogical dialogue in the university educational process. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod State Linguistic University named after N. A. Dobrolyubov, 17, 207-222. https://vestnik.lunn.ru/docs/journal/2012-17.pdf

Gorev, P., Telegina, N., Karavanova, L., & Feshina, S. (2018). Puzzles as a didactic tool for development of mathematical abilities of junior schoolchildren in basic and additional mathematical education. EURASIA: Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14 (10), 178-185. https://www.ejmste.com/article/puzzles-as-a-didactic-tool-for-development-of-mathematical-abilities-of-junior-schoolchildren-in-5558

Grutsyna, N. G. (2009). Pedagogical dialogue in various situations of the lesson, in book: Rhetoric. Moscow: Infra-M.

Khutorsky, A. V. (2019). Pedagogy. St. Petersburg, Russia: Peters.

Korchagina, M. I., & Vinogradova, S. A. (2007). Innovative mechanism of social partnership. Professional education The Capital, 7.

Korchagina, M. I. (2008). Communicability as the teacher’s professional quality. Professional education The Capital, 8. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kommunikativnost-professionalnoe-kachestvo-pedagoga

Krasnoshlykova, O. G. (2007). The teacher’s professionalism in the context of the municipal educational system development. https://portalus.ru/modules/shkola/rus_readme.php?subaction=showfull&id=1193922297&archive=1194448667&start_from=&ucat=&

Kurasheva, S. V., & Gradusova, T. K. (2005). The culture of educational activity and communicative competence of a university teacher. Polzunovsky vestnik, 3, 26-29. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18765935

Kurasheva, S. V., & Kandaurova, A. V. (2005). Pedagogical practice of students of the Faculty of History and Philology: educational and methodological manual. Russia: Omsk.

Poliakova, I. V., Lukashenko, D. V., Andryushchenko, I. S., Alekseeva, P. M., & Sergeeva, M. G. (2021). Training of future education managers for professional activities. Propósitos y Representaciones, 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nSPE2.1106

Poliakova, V. A. (2007). The formation of the personality’s dialogic culture (on the example of learning Words about Igor’s regiment at school). In The heritage of D. S. Likhachev in the Russia’s culture and education: Proceedings of the scientific conference, 3, 54-57.

Poliakova, V. A. (2008). The formation of the teacher’s readiness for dialogic interaction in the net professional communities. The Herald of N. I. Lobachevsky University, 6, 28-35. http://www.vestnik.unn.ru/ru/nomera?jnum=70

Presnukhina, I. A., Sergeeva, M. G., Karavanova, L. Z., Belokon, O. V., & Khvorikova, E. G. (2020). Development of research skills in the future foreign language teacher in the system of continuing education. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 13 (32), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v13i32.13370

Rogov, E. I. (1999). A manual of a practicing psychologist. Moscow, Russia: Publishing Centre Vlados.

Sanina, E., Mitrohina, S., Brunchukova, N., Mozgovaya, M., & Zenkova, L. (2020). The impact of the educational potential of school on successful development of the motivation-value attitude to the learning activities of students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8 (11), 5072 - 5080. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081107

Sergeeva, M. G., Klychkov, K. E., Lukashenko, D. V., Petrova, L. A., & Ilenko, N. M. (2020b). Professional development of a teacher in higher education. Revista Inclusiones, 7 Especial, 278-291. http://revistainclusiones.org/index.php/inclu/article/view/1333

Sergeeva, M. G., Yulina, G. N., Lukashenko, D. V., Egorova, L. A., & Bazarov, P. R. (2020a). Promising educational technologies for professional training. Propósitos y Representaciones, 8 (2). http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2020.v8nSPE2.691

Sharonova, S., Trubnikova, N., & Sokolova, N. (2018). Interpreting religious symbols as basic component of social value formation. European Journal of Science and Theology, 14 (3), 117-129. http://www.ejst.tuiasi.ro/Files/70/10_Sharonova%20et%20al.pdf

Shumakova, S. Y., Orlova, I. K. ., Kagosyan, A. S., Dandanova, S. V., & Kasatkina , N. . (2020). Pedagogical design of academic disciplines and lessons in blended learning. Laplage Em Revista, 6 (Extra-A), 248-255. https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020206Extra-A660p.248-255

Stepanov, P. A., Sukharina, O. P. (2016). Educational Dialog as Condition of Educational Subject Development. Pedagogical sciences, 3 (51), 341-353.

Tekucheva, I. V, & Gromova, L. Y. (2016). On present state of teaching Russian language in Russia. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11 (14), 6504-6511. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1115892.pdf

Vasbieva, D. G., Sokolova, N. L., Masalimova, A. R., Shinkaruk, V. M., & Kiva-Khamzina, Y. L. (2018). Exploring the EFL teacher’s role in a smart learning environment: a review study. XLinguae, 11 (2), 265-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.02.21

Vepreva, I. T. (2003). Metalanguage reflection in functional-typological coverage (Based on statements-reflexives 1991-2002) [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Ural State University]. Ekaterinburg.

Volkova, Y., & Panchenko, N. (2018). Discourse variation of the concepts of destructive emotions. Russian journal of linguistics, 22 (1), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-1-175-194

Zimniaya, I. A. (2010). Pedagogical psychology. Voronezh: Modek.

Publicado

2021-08-23

Cómo citar

Georgiyevna Sergeeva, M. ., Yuryevich Lesnikov, G. ., Ivanovich Kuzmin, S. ., & Aleksandrovich Vasilenko, S. . (2021). Interacción dialógica como componente de la competencia comunicativa del docente. Apuntes Universitarios, 11(4), 531 - 547. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v11i4.855