Modelos sociales de lucha contra la corrupción y prácticas corruptas en la dimensión global y Europea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v11i3.700Palavras-chave:
corrupción, prácticas corruptas, sociedad en transición, modelo anticorrupción, mecanismos sociales anticorrupción.Resumo
El artículo presenta un análisis comparativo (comparativo) de modelos sociales de anticorrupción y prácticas corruptas en las dimensiones global y europea. Se identifican y analizan los modelos básicos de anticorrupción: el primer modelo, vertical, donde el impacto en la propagación de la corrupción y prácticas corruptas se lleva a cabo de manera vertical, el cual se basa principalmente en mecanismos represivos (acoso, responsabilidad penal), estricta legalidad. sanciones y control social; el segundo modelo es horizontal (modelo de eliminación sistémica de factores de corrupción), que prevé el uso de métodos represivos, control social y mecanismos preventivos relacionados con la participación pública, formación de imperativos “anticorrupción” en la sociedad, alto nivel de cultura jurídica y responsabilidad social basada en la estructura de principios democráticos de la vida social.Downloads
Referências
Abotsi, A. K. (2018). Tolerable level of corruption for foreign direct investment in Europe and Asia. Contemporary Economics, 12(3), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.5709/CE.1897-9254.277
Bagmet, K. (2018). Regulation of institutional changes in the social sector of the national economy: conceptual approach. Economics. Ecology. Socium, 2(4), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2018.2.4-10
Bantash, A., Koval, V., Bashynska, M., & Kozlovtseva, V. (2020). Balanced territorial economic development in the conditions of providing stability of human resources management. Economics. Ecology. Socium, 4(3), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2020.4.3-6
Borychenko, K., Hudz, A., Koval, V., Golubkova, I., & Mazur, A. (2019). European standards for social protection of internally displaced persons. Dilemas contemporáneos-educación política y valores, 7 (SI), 88. https://doi.org/10.46377/dilemas.v29i1.1869
Bukanov, H., Kolesnyk, A., Tashkinova, O., Kotlubai, V., Koval, V. (2019). Social marketing in public administration of social service institutions. Revista Genero & Direito, 8 (6), 457-468. https://www.periodicojs.com.br/index.php/gei/article/view/43
Buryak, K. (2020). Features of anti-corruption legislation in the European Union Entrepreneurship, economy and law. International law, 2, 356-360. http://pgp-journal.kiev.ua/archive/2020/2/61.pdf
Dávid-Barrett, E., & Fazekas, M. (2020). Anti-corruption in aid-funded procurement: Is corruption reduced or merely displaced? World Development, 132, 105000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105000
Drobnic, J., Toros, J., & Weis, L. (2020). Ethical paradigms in business and society. Economics. Ecology. Socium, 4(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2020.4.1-1
Elliott, K. A. (1997). Corruption as an international policy problem: Overview and recommendations. Corruption and the global economy, 175, 177. https://piie.com/publications/chapters_preview/12/10ie2334.pdf
Ferwerda, J., Deleanu, I., & Unger, B. (2017). Corruption in public procurement: finding the right indicators. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 23(2), 245-267. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10610-016-9312-3
Georgieva, I. (2017). Using Transparency Against Corruption in Public Procurement. Springer International Publishing AG. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319513034
Granovetter, M. (2007). The Social Construction of Corruption. On Capitalism. Stanford University Press.
Hajduova, Z., Klimek, M., Daneshjo, N., & Prokopenko, O. (2019). Competitiveness of Franklin Templeton Fund Managers: Do the Fund Managers Exceed the Benchmark? Journal of Competitiveness, 3, 70-80. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2019.03.05
Hauser, C. (2019). Fighting against corruption: does anti-corruption training make any difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 159(1), 281-299. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-018-3808-3
Heath, A. F., Richards, L., & De Graaf, N. D. (2016). Explaining corruption in the developed world: The potential of sociological approaches. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 51-79. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074213
Hope Sr, K. R. (2017). Fighting corruption in developing countries: Some aspects of policy from lessons from the field. Journal of Public Affairs, 17(4), e1683. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pa.1683
https://doi.org/10.5339/rolacc.2018.2
Khondker, H. H. (2006). Sociology of Corruption and ‘Corruption of Sociology’ Evaluating the Contributions of Syed Hussein Alatas. Current Sociology, 54(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392106058832
Kikalishvili, M.V. (2019). Western European models of strategy for combating corruption crime. Scientific notes of TNU named after VI Vernadsky. Series: legal sciences, 6 (69), 124-130. http://www.juris.vernadskyjournals.in.ua/journals/2019/6_2019/26.pdf
Lapshyna, I. (2014). Corruption as a driver of migration aspirations: The case of Ukraine. Economics & Sociology, 7(4), 113. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2014/7-4/8
Lee Kuan Yew (2016). From the third world to the first. History of Singapore: 1965-2000. Kiev. Publishing gr. KM-BOOKS.
Lipinsky, D. A., Musatkina, A. A., Stankin, A. N., Chuklova, E. V. (2019). Corruption Risks as a threat to the national security: A comparative analysis of their prevention and minimization. Amazonia Investiga, 8(20), 354-364. https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/152
Michael, T. (2019). Humanity in the Enforcement of Anti-Corruption Laws. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 2(2), 211. http://dx.doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v5i2.162
Mikhnenko, А.М. (ed.). (2013). Prevention and counteraction to corruption. Kyiv: Academiya Finansovogo Upravleniya.
Nazarova, K., Hordopolov, V., Kopotiienko, T., Miniailo, V., Koval, V., & Diachenko, Y. (2019). Audit in the state economic security system. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 41(3), 419-430. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2019.34
Parisi, N. (2018). Assessment of the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures for the public sector and for private entities. Rule of Law and Anti-Corruption Center Journal, 2018(1), 2.
Pidberezhnyk, N.P. (2013). Anti-corruption policy in Western Europe: experience for Ukraine. Efficiency of public administration, 37, 123–132. http://www.lvivacademy.com/vidavnitstvo_1/download/zb37.pdf
Prokopenko, O., Omelyanenko, V., & Tirto, T. (2019). Security issues of system innovation strategies. SHS Web of Conferences, 65. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196503006
Prokopenko, O.V., Karminsky, A.M., & Klymenko, O.V. (2011). The role of ratings in the educational process of higher education institutions. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4(2),141–146. https://mmi.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/en/journals/2011/4_2/141-146
Romanyuk, B.V. (2009). World experience in the establishment and operation of institutions to prevent and combat corruption. Borotba z organizovanoyu zlochynnistyu i korupciyeyu, 21, 9–16. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/boz_2010_22_1
Suprun, T.M. (2017). Foreign experience in preventing and combating corruption. International Legal Bulletin: current issues (theory and practice), 2–3 (6–7), 199-204. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/muvnudp_2017_2-3_41
Tamosiuniene, R., Demianchuk, M., Koval, V. (2019). State Regulation of Bankruptcy Relations in the National Economy. Economics. Ecology. Socium, 3 (4), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2019.3.4-3
Transparency International (2021). Corruption Perceptions Index 2020: Ukraine in the Corruption Perceptions Index 2020. http://cpi.ti-ukraine.org/#/
Trepak, V.M. (2015). International experience in implementing a system of anti-corruption measures. Legal Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 2 (10), 233–246. https://scientbul.naiau.kiev.ua/index.php/lawjournal/article/download/583/587/
Tulenkov, M. V. (2011). Theory of organizational interaction. Kiev: IPK DSZU.
Vivchar, O., & Redkva, O. (2018). Analysis of indicators impact on economic security of enterprises in the context of socio-humanitarian components. Economics. Ecology. Socium, 2(3), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2018.2.3-7
Yankovyi, O., Koval, V., Trokhymets, O., Karpenko, M., Matskevich, Y. (2020). Economic assessment of investment on the basis of production functions. Turismo: Estudos &Práticas, 2, 1-11. http://natal.uern.br/periodicos/index.php/RTEP/article/view/1310
Yarmysh, O., Melnyk, R. (2015). Specialized anti-corruption institutions: world experience and national model. Scientific journal of the National Academy of the Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine, 2, 144-155. http://chasopysnapu.gp.gov.ua/chasopys/ua/pdf/6-2015/yarmysh.pdf
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Denys Chumachenko, Volodymyr Yemelyanov, Yaroslav Zhovnirchyk, Ivan Bandura, Nadiia Karpeko
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. Política propuesta para revistas de acceso abierto
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales) antes y durante el proceso de revisión y publicación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (veaThe Effect of Open Access).
