Condiciones pedagógicas para la formación de la competencia autoeducativa durante el estudio de materias profesionales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v12i4.1253Palavras-chave:
autoeducación, motivación, eficiencia, diferenciación, cualificación, pedagogía.Resumo
El objetivo de esta investigación fue desarrollar y probar experimentalmente la efectividad de un conjunto de condiciones pedagógicas para construir la competencia autodidacta de los futuros especialistas de la carrera de pedagogía. Los métodos empleados consistieron en: análisis, síntesis, cuestionario encuesta, simulación y métodos de estadística matemática Los indicadores que describen la competencia autodidacta de los alumnos del grupo experimental fueron significativamente superiores a los de los alumnos del grupo control. Los estudiantes del grupo experimental discutieron más activamente temas de autoaprendizaje, elaboraron mejor un plan para resolver una situación profesional problemática planteada por el docente, tuvieron mayores indicadores de motivación y autoeficacia. Estos resultados fueron promovidos por la diferenciación de la motivación que los profesores utilizaron en el experimento. Los resultados obtenidos pueden ser utilizados para mejorar las calificaciones pedagógicas de los docentes, así como para mejorar la calidad de la formación de estudiantes de diferentes carreras en el estudio de materias profesionales. Por ende, las perspectivas de futuras investigaciones incluyen probar el impacto de las herramientas desarrolladas en el desarrollo de la competencia autodidacta de los estudiantes de carreras médicas, técnicas y económicas.Downloads
Referências
Arens, A. K., Jansen, M., Preckel, F., Schmidt, I., & Brunner, M. (2021). The Structure of Academic Self-Concept: A Methodological Review and Empirical Illustration of Central Models. Review of Educational Research, 91 (1), 34-72. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320972186
Astapenko, E. V., & Bedareva, A. V. (2020). Using media resources to develop students’ skills in self-educational activities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1691 (1), 012172.
Behzadnia, B., Adachi, P. J. C., Deci, E. L. & Mohammadzadeh, H. (2018). Associations between students' perceptions of physical education teachers' interpersonal styles and students' wellness, knowledge, performance, and intentions to persist at physical activity: A self-determination theory approach. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 39, 10-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.07.003
Bondie, R. S., Dahnke, C., & Zusho, A. (2019). How Does Changing “One-Size-Fits-All” to Differentiated Instruction Affect Teaching? Review of Research in Education, 43 (1), 336-362. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821130
Bureau, J. S., Howard, J. L., Chong, J. X., & Guay, F. (2021). Pathways to student motivation: A meta-analysis of antecedents of autonomous and controlled motivations. Review of Educational Research, 92 (1), 46-72. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211042426
Byhar, H. P., Zvozdetska, V. H., Prokop, I. S., Pits, I. I., & Hordiichuk, O. Y. (2020). Pedagogical Conditions for the Development of Self-Educational Competence of Future Specialists in the Study of Professional Subjects. International Journal of Higher Education, 9 (7), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n7p257
Calavia, M. B., Blanco, T., & Casas, R. (2020). Fostering creativity as a problem-solving competence through design: Think-Create-Learn, a tool for teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100761
Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-Based Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90 (4), 499-541. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544
Cho, M.-H., Cheon, J., & Lim, S. (2021). Preservice teachers’ motivation profiles, self-regulation, and affective outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 42 (1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1869528
Cho, H. J., Wang, C., Bonem, E. M., Levesque-Bristol, C. (2022). How Can We Support Students’ Learning Experiences in Higher Education? Campus Wide Course Transformation Program Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 47, 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09571-9
Duncan, T., Pintrich, P., Smith, D., & McKeachie, W. J. (2015). Motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) manual. National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2547.6968
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859.
Ganieva, Y. N., Azitova, G. S., Chernova, Y. A., Yakovleva, I. G., Shaidullina, A. R., & Sadovaya, V. V. (2014). Model of high school students professional education. Life Science Journal, 11 (8), 504-515. http://www.lifesciencesite.com/lsj/life1108s/109_B00076life1108s14_504_509.pdf
Glazunova, O. G., Voloshyna, T. V., & Starychenko, Y. M. (2018). Formation of self-educational competence of future it specialists. Information technologies and teaching aids, 66 (4), 122-138. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v66i4.2124
Gruzdeva, M. L., Vaganova, O. I., Kaznacheeva, S. N., Bystrova, N. V., & Chanchina, A. V. (2020) Modern Educational Technologies in Professional Education. In: L. G. Popkova (Ed.), Growth Poles of the Global Economy: Emergence, Changes and Future Perspectives (pp. 1097-1103). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15160-7_110
Guseynova, E. L. (2020). Motivation as a Factor of Professional Competence Development in Students. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 447, 152-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200723.031
Hartwig, M. K., & Malain, E. D. (2022). Do students space their course study? Those who do earn higher grades. Learning and Instruction, 77, 101538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101538
HolonIQ. (2020). Education in 2030. Five scenarios for the future and talent. https://www.holoniq.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/HolonIQ-Education-in-2030.pdf
Ishmuradova, A. M., Leyfa, I. I., Magadieva, G. F., Yatsevich, L. P., Demyanenko, M. A., & Khismatullina, R. B. (2015). Features of formation of students foreign language competence in self-learning activity. Asian Social Science, 11 (3), 176-181. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n3p176
Lambie, G. W., Hayes, B. G., Griffith, C., Limberg, D. & Mullen, P. R. (2014). An Exploratory Investigation of the Research Self-Efficacy, Interest in Research, and Research Knowledge of Ph.D. in Education Students. Innovative Higher Education, 39, 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-013-9264-1
Leshchenko, M. P., Kolomiiets, A. M., Iatsyshyn, A. V., Kovalenko, V. V., Dakal, A. V., & Radchenko, O. O. (2021). Development of informational and research competence of postgraduate and doctoral students in conditions of digital transformation of science and education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840 (1), 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012057
Li, L., Peng, Z., Lu, L., Liao, H., & Li, H. (2020). Peer relationships, self-efficacy, academic motivation, and mathematics achievement in Zhuang adolescents: A moderated mediation model. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105358
Nikula, N., & Brazhaniuk, A. (2021). The Formation of the Future Specialist Professional Culture in the Educational Space of the University. LUMEN Proceedings, 16, 332-349. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/atee2020/22
Pekrun, R. (2021). Teachers need more than knowledge: Why motivation, emotion, and self-regulation are indispensable. Educational Psychologist, 56 (4), 312-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1991356
Rubtcova, M, & Pavenkov, O. (2019). Pedagogical Support of the Development of Humanitarian Competence of Students – Future Specialists in Public Relations. ACN- International Conference on Recent Developments in Social Science and Business Management (ICRDSSBM), Bangalore, Karnataka, India. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3319354
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Safin, R. S., Korchagin, E. A., Elizarova, V. A., Vildanov, I. E., Abitov, R. N., Kora, N. A., & Nigmetzyanova, V. M. (2015). Pedagogical conditions of students independent readiness formation for educational cognitive activity. Asian Social Science, 11 (4), 269-274. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n4p269
Santana-Monagas, E., Núñez, J. L., Loro, J. F., Huéscar, E. & León, J. (2022). Teachers’ engaging messages: The role of perceived autonomy, competence and relatedness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103556
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor: NFER-NELSON. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/selfscal.htm
Striguna, S. (2015). Essence of Self-Education Competence in Pedagogy. Santa Striguna. Essence of Self-Education Competence in Pedagogy, 1, 405-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2015vol1.308
Trolian, T. L., Jach, E. A. & Archibald, G. C. (2021). Shaping Students’ Career Attitudes toward Professional Success: Examining the Role of Student-Faculty Interactions. Innovative Higher Education, 46, 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09529-3
Yu, S., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2020). A Cross-Classified Path Analysis of the Self-Determination Theory Model on the Situational, Individual and Classroom Levels in College Education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101857
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Nataliia Dymar, Kateryna Kruty, Iryna Desnova, Galyna Kondratska, Svitlana Yaremenko
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. Política propuesta para revistas de acceso abierto
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales) antes y durante el proceso de revisión y publicación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (veaThe Effect of Open Access).
