The analogy of law in civil law educational practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v11i1.544Keywords:
legal analogy, civil law, law, justice, legislation, jurisprudence.Abstract
The objective of this research was to show how actively the legal analogy mechanism is applied in current civil law practice, identifying the reasons for the main role of legal analogy as an active tool in the justice administration process. The method of analogy was considered as the key tool of the object of the study, and together with the special comparative legal and technical instruments, the author applied general logical methods that are characteristic of the most civilized studies, such as analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, comparison and generalization. Furthermore, the author defined some important cases that were decided by applying legal analogies and may form the basis for future investigations in the development of relevant judicial practice. In this sense, the author's contribution consists of a new concept of the correlation between the development and breakdown of legal standards and the degree of demand for legal analogy in jurisprudence.Downloads
References
Albov, A.P. (2013). Cultural norms of as the law source and form. Modern Lawyer, 4, 54-65. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20388062
Alieskerov, M. (2002). Procedural analogy in civil process. Russian Justice, 3, 18-20. http://base.garant.ru/5116996/
Andreev, V.K. (2020). Dynamics of Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Russian Law, 3, 58-68. DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2020.030
Anisimov, V. F. (2016). A small opinion in a big discussion. Russian judge, 6, 56-57. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26254834
Arkhipov, V.V, Naumov, V. B. (2017). On some issues of the theoretical foundations of the development of legislation on robotics: aspects of will and legal personality. Law, 5 157-170. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29144841
Balashov, A.N., Mishutina, E.I. (2009). The issues of the analogy of law and the legal analogy application in civil process. Russian Justice, 10, 59-62. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13025821
Bevzenko, R.S. (2010). The application of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Yurayt
Bogdanova E.E., Maleina M.N., Ksenofontova D.S. (2020) Certain Problems of Citizens' Rights Protection when Using Genomic Technologies. Lex russica, 5, 129-142. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2020.162.5.129-142
Bondarenko, N.L. (2013). The modern methodological approach to the principles of civil law study. Bulletin of Perm University. Juridical sciences, 4, 305-309. http://www.jurvestnik.psu.ru/index.php/ru/vypusk-4222013
Braginsky, M.I., Vitryansky, V.V. (2001). Contract law. General Provisions. Moscow: Statut.
D'amato, A. (2010). Legal Uncertainty. Northwestern Public Law Research, Paper No. 10-79. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1707826
Damele, G. (2014). Analogia Legis and Analogia Iuris: An Overview from a Rhetorical Perspective. Argumentation Library, 25, 243-256. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06334-8_14
Davis, K.E. (2011). The Concept of Legal Uncertainty. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1990813
Demin, A.V. (2017). Discretion in Tax Law. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. Issue 35. Pp. 42-55. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2945965.
Diogenes, L. (1979). On the life, teachings and sayings of famous philosophers. Myisl, Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Institute of Philosophy.
Erokhova, M.A. (2014). Commentary to the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation of April 4, 2014 N 22 On Certain Issues of Money Judgment to the Recoverer for Non-Execution of a Judicial Act. Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, 6, 32-53.
Ferrari, F., Bocharova, N. (2015). The astreinte in the Italian and Russian Administrative (Judicial) and Civil Proceedings. Russian Law Journal, 3, 9-45. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2015-3-3-8-45
Golubtsov, V.G. (2016). The Principle of Good Faith as an Element of the Legal Mechanism for Stimulating the Debtor to Proper Execution of Obligations and Guaranteeing Creditors’ Interests: Analysis of Judicial and Arbitration Practice. Juridical Sciences, 32, 175-184. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-32-175-184
Hunter, D. (2008). Teaching and Using Analogy in Law. Journal of the Association of Legal Writing Directors, 2. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1089669
Ioffe, O. S. (2004). Selected Works. St. Petersburg.
Koszowski, M. (2017). Analogical Reasoning in Statutory Law. Journal of Forensic Research, 8. DOI: 10.4172/2157-7145.1000372
Kulakov, V.V. (2013). Basic principles of civil law as a special form of law. Bulletin of Perm University. Juridical sciences, 4, 185-192. http://www.jurvestnik.psu.ru/index.php/ru/vypusk-4222013
Kuznetsova, O.A. (2006). Direct (immediate) impact of civil law principles. Notary, 1, 37-39.
Laptev, V.A. (2015). Court decisions as part of judicial practice: application of the law and the principle of justness. Arbitration and civil procedure, 10, 28-33. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24350970
Laptev, V.A. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Liability for its Work. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2, 79-102. DOI: 10.17-323/2072-8166.2019.2.79.102
Luneva, E. (2015). The Trends in Development of Methodology of Scientific Cognition of Civil Legal Reality. Juridical Sciences, 3(29), 117-124. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2015-3-117-124
Macagno, F., Walton, D. (2009). Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 42(2), 154-182. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1742956
Maleina, M.N. (2019). The role of legal principles in eliminating and minimizing the risks of genomic technologies implementation. Lex russica, 8, 121-128. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.153.8.121-128
Malyushin, A.A. (2015). Constitutional and judicial lawmaking (rights establishment) in the Russian Federation as a special form of modern lawmaking. Russian Justice, 10, 6-8. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24336861
Mikryukov, V.А. (2017). Limits of Analogy in the Mechanism of Judicial Reduction of Property Sanctions. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 5(27), 1563-1575. https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/1715
Panova, I.V. (2012). Judicial process in the context of Russian legal culture. Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, 1, 74-84. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17215172
Plato. (2006). Works in four volumes. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg University.
Polyakov, D.N. (2014). General ways of overcoming gaps in civil law. Bulletin of the Omsk Law Academy, 2(23), 54. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21545844
Raban, O. (2010). The Fallacy of Legal Certainty: Why Vague Legal Standards May Be Better for Capitalism and Liberalism. Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 19(175). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1419683
Romanenko D. (2017) Legal Nature of Gaps in Anglo-American Common Law, Civil Law, 3, 40-42. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29322903
Rovny, V.V. (2011). Civil Law. Guide book in 3 vols. Moscow: RG Press.
Schauer, F., Spellman, B.A. (2017). Analogy, Expertise, and Experience. University of Chicago Law Review, 84(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3064100
Shindyapina, E.D., Boshno, S.V. (2006). Correlation of legal analogy and the analogy of law. Lawyer, 7, 6-9.
Sizemova, O.B. (2015). About regulatory sources in the mechanism of legal regulation of interbank payments. Banking law, 4, 35-41. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23772275
Slepenkova, O.A. (2011). Some aspects of the application of civil law principles in judicial practice. Russian Justice, 9, 4-6.
Szabo, I. (1964). Socialist law. Moscow: Progress.
Taylor, G. (2009). Law and Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsikhotsky, A.V. (2011). Institute of analogy in the mechanism of overcoming law gaps. Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Law, 2, 67-74 https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17105162
Ulyanov, A.V. (2014). Good faith in civil law. Russian Law Journal, 6, 133-140.
Vaipan, V.A. (2017). Fundamentals of the legal regulation of the digital economy. Law and Economics, 11, 5-18.
Van Gestel, R., Micklitz, H.-W., Rubin, E.L. (2017). Rethinking Legal Scholarship: A Transatlantic Dialogue. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2644088
Veter, N.Y. (2015). To the issue of the concept of the evasion of law. Power of the Law, 1, 155-165. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24355585
Volkov, A.V. (2010). Formalism against subjectivity in civil law. Modern Law, 1, 35-39.
Weinreb, L. (2005). Legal reason: The use of analogy in legal argument. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316597774
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Viktor Mikryukov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The authors retain their copyright but assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information as long as they mention the authorship of the work and that it was first published in this journal.
- Authors may make other independent or additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged and advised to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
