John Rawls: una ética jurídica sin fundamento metafísico - John Rawls: legal ethics without metaphysical foundation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v0i2.243Keywords:
Liberalismo, filosofía política, John Rawls, democracia, teoría política, pluralismo, neocontractualismo, sociedad bien ordenada, justiciaAbstract
Como consecuencia de su filiación liberal democrática, hay en Rawls una intención manifiesta de no querer priorizar ninguna concepción del bien, puesto que ello crearía conflictos en una sociedad que debe ser pluralista, progresista, liberal y democrática, de acuerdo con los supuestos políticos que sostienen su teoría. Por ello, sostiene Rawls, una teoría que persiga la justicia como valor supremo, ha de ser siempre “política” y no “metafísica”. Cabe cuestionarse hasta dónde es posible que la teoría rawlsiana permanezca exenta de metafísica y si existe realmente su tan mentada neutralidad de supuestos.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2015-09-29
How to Cite
Aranda Fraga, F. (2015). John Rawls: una ética jurídica sin fundamento metafísico - John Rawls: legal ethics without metaphysical foundation. Apuntes Universitarios, 5(2), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v0i2.243
Issue
Section
Artículos de revisión
License
- The authors retain their copyright but assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information as long as they mention the authorship of the work and that it was first published in this journal.
- Authors may make other independent or additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged and advised to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).