The essence and peculiarities of the implementation of the concept of flexicurity in Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v13i4.1490

Keywords:

Flexicurity, Flexibility, Security, Social welfare

Abstract

The challenges of the modern world led to changes in business organization, including forms of labor organization. The use of flexible forms has become a modern tool for human resource management in a changing environment. The concept of flexicurity has been used in European countries for a long time. This study employed the methods of bibliographic analysis VosViewer and Google Trends to investigate issues related to flexible employment policies from three primary perspectives: a) institutional (where the state plays a central role in labor market regulation); b) anti-crisis (implies implementing flexible employment policies in response to economic crises and the efforts of employers to reduce personnel costs); and c) corporate (which focuses on employee needs and corporate social responsibility). Furthermore, modern approaches used in developed countries for implementing flexible employment policies under the concept of flexicurity were analyzed and summarized in a matrix. This analysis provides valuable insights for future research in Ukraine, including regulatory and legal provision of non-standard forms of employment such as freelancing, crowdsourcing, and self-employment; the development of strategies to attract non-standard forms of employment those categories of the population that cannot compete on the labor market (people with limited opportunities, young people who are looking for work for the first time, women with children, people of retirement age); the use of flexible forms of employment for a large number of internally displaced persons who have left their homes and refugees, which will reduce the unemployment rate in the country.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atkinson, J. (1985). Flexibility, uncertainty and manpower management (89th ed.). The Institute for Employment Studies.

Bekker, S., & Mailand, M. (2018). The European flexicurity concept and the Dutch and Danish flexicurity models: How have they managed the Great Recession? Social Policy and administration, 53, 142-155.

Blaiton, P. (2002). Hybkost chelovecheskymy resursamy. Pyter.

Bokov, O. V. (2018). Nestandartni formy zainiatosti yak element hnuchkosti rynku pratsi. Derzhavni upravlinski studii, 6. http://studio.ipk.edu.ua/nestandartni-formy-zaynyatosti-yak-element-hnuchkosti-rynku-pratsi/

Buda, T. (2016). Hnuchki i nestandartni formy zainiatosti: sotsialni vyhody i ryzyky. Stalyi rozvytok ekonomiky, 2,149-157.

Doshchenko, A. V. (2014). Rozvytok dystantsiinoi zainiatosti yak skladova transformatsii sotsialno-trudovoi sfery. Rynok pratsi ta zainiatist naselennia, 4, 21-25.

Hnidenko, V. I. (2021). Pravove rehuliuvannia hnuchkykh form zainiatosti dys. kand. ekon. nauk: Natsionalnyi yurydychnyi universytetspets. https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/19408

Huk, L. P. (2016). Hnuchka nestandartna zainiatist: systematyzatsiia form i vykorystannia na rynku pratsi Ukrainy. Ukrainskyi sotsium,1, 114-129.

Inshyn, M. I. (2020). Vydy ta zmist perevah dystantsiinoi zainiatosti pratsivnykiv v Ukraini. Teoretychni pytannia yurysprudentsii i problemy pravozastosuvannia: vyklyky  stolittia, 5, 48-51.

Keune, M. (2008). Flexicurity: a Contested Concept at the Core of the European Labour Market Debate. Intereconomics, 43,92-98. https://www.econbiz.de/Record/flexicurity-a-contested-concept-at-the-core-of-the-european-labour-market-debate-keune-maarten/10010272207

Kolot A. (2009) Transformatsiia instytutu zainiatosti yak skladova hlobalnykh zmin u sotsialnotrudovii sferi. Ukraina: aspekty pratsi, 8, 3–14.

Kustovska O.V. (2005). Metodolohiia systemnoho pidkhodu ta naukovykh doslidzhen: kurs lektsii. Ekonomichna dumka.

Liubokhynets. L. (2011). Hnuchki formy zainiatosti ta fleksybilizatsii rynku pratsi v umovakh pohlyblennia hlobalizatsiinykh protsesiv svitovoi ekonomiky. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 6, 243-248.

Freches, M. (2017). Flexible work arrangements in small and medium enterprises – incidence, motivations, advantages and disadvantages. Dissertation submitted as partial requirement for the conferral of Master in Human Resources Management and Organizational Consultancy.

Noja, G. (2018). Flexicurity models and productivity interference in C.E.E. countries: a new approach based on cluster and spatial analysis. Economic Research, 31(1), 1111-1136. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1456356

Novozhylova, L. V. (2008). Osoblyvosti vykorystannia hnuchkykh form zainiatosti v postindustrialnykh krainakh. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky Prychornomor`ia, 3, 143-155.

Obikhod S.V. (2017). Nestandartna zainiatist v pravlinnia suchasnymy pidpryiemstvamy. https://conf.ztu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/208.pdf

Petrenko, V. (2014) Pozykova pratsia yak netypova forma zainiatosti. https://zib.com.ua/ua/79136.html

Rogowski, R. (2008). Governance of the European Social Model: The Case of Flexicurity. Intereconomics, 43, 82-91. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/42044/1/562277226.pdf

Rudakova, S.H., Danylevych, N.S., & Shchetinina, L.V. (2013). Vprovadzhennia hnuchkykh form zainiatosti na pidpryiemstvakh Ukrainy. Efektyvna ekonomika, 12. http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=2593

Sereda, O. H. (2014). Deiaki aspekty vprovadzhennia rehuliuvannia dystantsiinoi roboty v suchasnomu zakonodavstvi. In Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia “Aktualni problemy yurydychnoi nauky na shliakhu suchasnoi rozbudovy derzhavy i suspilstva”, Sumy: SumDU.

Shahidi, F., Moortel, D., Muntaner C., Davis O., & Siddiqi, A. (2016). Do flexicurity policies protect workers from the adverse health consequences of temporary employment? A cross-national comparative analysis. SSM – Population Health, 2, 674-682. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827316300702#:~:text=Flexicurity%20policies%20are%20assumed%20to,the%20flexicurity%20approach%20remains%20lacking

Tangian, A. (2008). Is Europe Ready for Flexicurity? Empirical Evidence, Critical Remarks and a Reform Proposal. Intereconomics, 43, 99-111. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/42039/1/562279741.pdf

Tros, F. (2004) Towards ”flexicurity” in policies for the older workers in EU-countries? Paper at the IREC Conference 2004, Utrecht, August 26–28. http://www.tilburguniversity.nl/faculties/frw/research/schoordijk/flexicurity/publications/papers/fxp2004-9-tros_irec_utrecht.pdf

Tsizhma, Yu. (2013). Kontseptsiia fleksik`iuriti ta nestandartni formy zainiatosti: vyklyky sohodennia. Biznes-inform, 7, 197-202. http://www.business-inform.net/pdf/2013/7_0/197_202.pdf

Valetska, O. V., & Prykhodko, O. (2016). Osoblyvosti pravovoho rehuliuvannia dystantsiinoi zainiatosti v trudovykh vidnosynakh. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Kherson, 6, 138-141.

Viebrock E., & Clasen J. (2009). Flexicurity: A state of the art review. SSRN Electronic Journal, 12. http://old.adapt.it/adapt-indice-a-z/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/viebroc_lasen.pdf

Wilthagen, T., & Tros, F. (2008) The Concept of Flexicurity: A New Approach to Regulating Employment and Labour Markets. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 10 (2), 166-186. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228244233_The_Concept_of_Flexicurity_A_New_Approach_to_Regulating_Employment_and_Labour_Markets

Zhou, J. (2008). Denmark’s Flexicurity Model: The Answer for Europe? Intereconomics, 43, 78-82. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/42023/1/562276823.pdf

Downloads

Published

2023-12-29

How to Cite

Sotnikova, Y., Nazarova, G., Churkin, A. ., & Baliasnyi, V. (2023). The essence and peculiarities of the implementation of the concept of flexicurity in Ukraine. Apuntes Universitarios, 13(4), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v13i4.1490