Key pedagogical aspects of the study of philology by university students in the framework of the management of the educational process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v13i1.1323Keywords:
Pedagogy, Foreign philology, Management systems, Education institutions, Information technologies.Abstract
The main purpose of the paper is to identify the key pedagogical aspects of the study of philology by university students in the framework of the management of the educational process. The process of intercultural integration at the national and international levels led to the modernization of the content of language education. At the present stage, significant positive changes have been made in the education system both in organizational, managerial and content aspects. The sociocultural aspect of the study of foreign philology has changed significantly, and the study of a second foreign language both in general education institutions and universities has become no exception, which caused an increase in motivation in the study of a foreign language in general. Particular attention in this regard is the increased interest in the latest information technologies, which have become an integral part of the modern world, they largely determine the further economic and social development of mankind. As a result of the study, the main prerequisites for the modernization and implementation of innovative methods in the systems of foreign philology of university students were analyzed.Downloads
References
Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6 (1), 7-16, 10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
Akishina, E., Wagner, I., Kurbatova, N., & Savenkova, L. (2022). Formation of the culture of social relations in students based on the development of their personal social experience. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 15 (34), 12-15. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v15i34.17215
Aquino, L. N., Mamat, N., & Che-Mustafa, M. (2019). Levels of competence in the learning domains of kindergarten entrants. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 8 (1), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol8.no1.5.2019
Awe, O. A. & Church, E. M. (2020). Project flexibility and creativity: the moderating role of training utility. Management Decision, 1 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2020-0226
Azorín C. & Ainscow M. (2020). Guiding schools on their journey towards inclusion, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24 (1), 58-76, 10.1080/13603116.2018.1450900
Bakhov, I., Ryzhykov, V. & Kolisnyk, O. (2018). Leadership Abilities of a Military Manager, Professionalism of a Commander as the Guarantee of the Practice of Effective Activity of a Military Organization. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7 (4.38), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24318
Beaton, M. C., Thomson, S., Cornelius, S., Lofthouse, R., Kools, Q., & Huber, S. (2021). Conceptualising teacher education for inclusion: Lessons for the professional learning of educators from transnational and cross-sector perspectives. Sustainability, 13 (4), 1– 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042167
Beauchamp, G. (2004). Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools:Towards an effective transition framework, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 3 (3), 337-348, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14759390400200189
Eliyana, A., Ma’arif, S., & Muzakki, В. (2019). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment effect in the transformational leadership towards employee performance. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 25 (3), 144–150.
Haug, P. (2017). Understanding inclusive education: ideals and reality. Scand. J. Disabil. Res., 19, 206–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2016.1224778
Hornby, G. (2015). Inclusive special education: evidence-based practices for children with special needs and disabilities. British J. Special Educ., 42, 232–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12101
Kivirand, T., Leijen, Ä., Lepp, L., & Malva, L. (2020). The meaning of inclusive education and factors for effective implementation in the Estonian context: A view of specialists who train or advise teachers. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian J. Educ., 8, 48–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/eha.2020.8.1.03
Kruszewska A., Nazaruk S. & Szewczyk K. (2020). Polish teachers of early education in the face of distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: the difficulties experienced and suggestions for the future, Education 3-13, Research in Education, 6 (2): 21-39. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijire.v6i2.4474
Kryshtanovych, M., Kryshtanovych, S., Stechkevych, O., Ivanytska, O., & Huzii, I. (2020). Prospects for the Development of Inclusive Education using Scientific and Mentoring Methodsunder the Conditions of Post-Pandemic Society. Postmodern Openings, 11 (2), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/160
Kryshtanovych, M., Romanova, A., Koval, I., Lesko, N., & Lukashevska, U. (2021). Research of problems and prospects of state development in the pedagogical process. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 14 (33), e16534. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v14i33.16534
Marek, M., Wu, W.-C. & Chew, C. S. (2020). Teacher Experiences in Converting Classes to Distance Learning in the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 19, 40-60. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.20210101.oa3
Orchard, J., Heilbronn, R., & Winstanley, C. (2016). Philosophy for Teachers (P4T): Developing new teachers’ applied ethical-decision making. Ethics and Education, 11 (1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2016.1145495
Reyes-Chávez, R. & Prado-Rodriguez, A. (2020). Information and Communication Technology as Tools for Inclusive Education Systems in Elementary Schools. Educación, 44 (2), 506-525. 2215-2644. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i2.38781
Roth K., Mollvik L., Alshoufani R., Adami R., Dineen K., Majlesi F., Peters M. & Tesar, M. (2020). Philosophy of education in a new key: Constraints and possibilities in present times with regard to dignity, Educational Philosophy and Theory, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1851189
Shevchenko, Y., Moskalyova, L., Kanarova, O., & Poznanska, O. (2019). Development of a System for Improving Future Teachers’ Readiness for the Child’s Spiritual and Moral Development in a Cross-Cultural Space. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 8 (4), 251-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i4.2352
Sorkos, G., Magos, K. (2021). When Inclusion in Greek Schools Is Delayed: Listening to the Voices of Chinese Primary School Students. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 7 (5), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2021.1969485
Stepaniuk, I. (2019). Inclusive education in eastern European countries: a current state and future directions. Int. J. Incl. Educ., 23, 328–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1430180
Sydorenko, V., Shorobura, I., Ponomarenko, A., Dei, M., & Dzhus, O. (2020). Application of technologies of formal and non-formal education for continuous professional development of the modern specialist. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 13 (32), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v13i32.14729
Van-Mieghem, A., Verschueren, K., Petry, K., & Struyf, E. (2018). An analysis of research on inclusive education: a systematic search and meta review. Int. J. Incl. Educ., 24, 675–689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1482012
Vaz, S., Wilson, N., Falkmer, M., Sim, A., Scott, M., Cordier, R., & Falkmer, T. (2015). Factors Associated with Primary School Teachers' Attitudes Towards the Inclusion of Students with Disabilities. PloS One, 10 (8), e0137002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137002
Ydo, Y. (2020). Inclusive education: global priority, collective responsibility. Prospects, 49, 97–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09520-y
Yetik, E., Ozdamar, N. & Bozkurt, A. (2020). Seamless learning design criteria in the context of open and distance learning, Managing and Designing Online Courses in Ubiquitous Learning Environments, 106-127. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9779-7.ch006
Zdanevych, L. V., Kharkivska, A. A., Popovych, O. M., Bobyrieva, O. S., & Kovrei, D. Y. (2020). Reflection of the personality-oriented approach by the subjects of its implementation in Eastern Europe. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 13 (32), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v13i32.14967
Zgaga, P. (2019). Inclusion in education: Between opportunities and limits. Introduction to the theme, in Inclusion in Education: Reconsidering Limits, Identifying Possibilities (Berlin: Peter Lang), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633066
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Yevhen Muzia, Alona Bovt, Viktoriia Ryhovanova, Iryna Skril, Yuliia Hliudzyk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The authors retain their copyright but assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information as long as they mention the authorship of the work and that it was first published in this journal.
- Authors may make other independent or additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged and advised to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
