Pedagogical conditions for the formation of self-educational competence during the study of professional subjects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v12i4.1253Keywords:
self-education, motivation, efficiency, differentiation, qualification, pedagogy.Abstract
The aim of this research was to develop and experimentally test how effective is a set of pedagogical conditions is for building self-educational competence of future specialists majoring in Pedagogy. The methods that were used are the following: analysis, synthesis, questionnaire survey, simulation, and methods of mathematical statistics. The indicators that describe the self-educational competence of the experimental group students were significantly higher than those students of the control group were. The experimental group students more actively discussed self-studied topics, better made a plan to solve a problematic professional situation set by the teacher, and had higher indicators of motivation and self-efficacy. These results were promoted by the differentiation of motivation that the teachers used in the experiment. The obtained results can be used to improve the teachers’ pedagogical qualifications, as well as to improve the quality of training of students of different majors in the study of professional subjects. Therefore, prospects for further research include testing the impact of the developed tools on building self-educational competence of students of medical, technical and economic majors.Downloads
References
Arens, A. K., Jansen, M., Preckel, F., Schmidt, I., & Brunner, M. (2021). The Structure of Academic Self-Concept: A Methodological Review and Empirical Illustration of Central Models. Review of Educational Research, 91 (1), 34-72. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320972186
Astapenko, E. V., & Bedareva, A. V. (2020). Using media resources to develop students’ skills in self-educational activities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1691 (1), 012172.
Behzadnia, B., Adachi, P. J. C., Deci, E. L. & Mohammadzadeh, H. (2018). Associations between students' perceptions of physical education teachers' interpersonal styles and students' wellness, knowledge, performance, and intentions to persist at physical activity: A self-determination theory approach. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 39, 10-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.07.003
Bondie, R. S., Dahnke, C., & Zusho, A. (2019). How Does Changing “One-Size-Fits-All” to Differentiated Instruction Affect Teaching? Review of Research in Education, 43 (1), 336-362. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821130
Bureau, J. S., Howard, J. L., Chong, J. X., & Guay, F. (2021). Pathways to student motivation: A meta-analysis of antecedents of autonomous and controlled motivations. Review of Educational Research, 92 (1), 46-72. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211042426
Byhar, H. P., Zvozdetska, V. H., Prokop, I. S., Pits, I. I., & Hordiichuk, O. Y. (2020). Pedagogical Conditions for the Development of Self-Educational Competence of Future Specialists in the Study of Professional Subjects. International Journal of Higher Education, 9 (7), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n7p257
Calavia, M. B., Blanco, T., & Casas, R. (2020). Fostering creativity as a problem-solving competence through design: Think-Create-Learn, a tool for teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100761
Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-Based Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90 (4), 499-541. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544
Cho, M.-H., Cheon, J., & Lim, S. (2021). Preservice teachers’ motivation profiles, self-regulation, and affective outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 42 (1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1869528
Cho, H. J., Wang, C., Bonem, E. M., Levesque-Bristol, C. (2022). How Can We Support Students’ Learning Experiences in Higher Education? Campus Wide Course Transformation Program Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 47, 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09571-9
Duncan, T., Pintrich, P., Smith, D., & McKeachie, W. J. (2015). Motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) manual. National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2547.6968
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859.
Ganieva, Y. N., Azitova, G. S., Chernova, Y. A., Yakovleva, I. G., Shaidullina, A. R., & Sadovaya, V. V. (2014). Model of high school students professional education. Life Science Journal, 11 (8), 504-515. http://www.lifesciencesite.com/lsj/life1108s/109_B00076life1108s14_504_509.pdf
Glazunova, O. G., Voloshyna, T. V., & Starychenko, Y. M. (2018). Formation of self-educational competence of future it specialists. Information technologies and teaching aids, 66 (4), 122-138. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v66i4.2124
Gruzdeva, M. L., Vaganova, O. I., Kaznacheeva, S. N., Bystrova, N. V., & Chanchina, A. V. (2020) Modern Educational Technologies in Professional Education. In: L. G. Popkova (Ed.), Growth Poles of the Global Economy: Emergence, Changes and Future Perspectives (pp. 1097-1103). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15160-7_110
Guseynova, E. L. (2020). Motivation as a Factor of Professional Competence Development in Students. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 447, 152-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200723.031
Hartwig, M. K., & Malain, E. D. (2022). Do students space their course study? Those who do earn higher grades. Learning and Instruction, 77, 101538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101538
HolonIQ. (2020). Education in 2030. Five scenarios for the future and talent. https://www.holoniq.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/HolonIQ-Education-in-2030.pdf
Ishmuradova, A. M., Leyfa, I. I., Magadieva, G. F., Yatsevich, L. P., Demyanenko, M. A., & Khismatullina, R. B. (2015). Features of formation of students foreign language competence in self-learning activity. Asian Social Science, 11 (3), 176-181. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n3p176
Lambie, G. W., Hayes, B. G., Griffith, C., Limberg, D. & Mullen, P. R. (2014). An Exploratory Investigation of the Research Self-Efficacy, Interest in Research, and Research Knowledge of Ph.D. in Education Students. Innovative Higher Education, 39, 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-013-9264-1
Leshchenko, M. P., Kolomiiets, A. M., Iatsyshyn, A. V., Kovalenko, V. V., Dakal, A. V., & Radchenko, O. O. (2021). Development of informational and research competence of postgraduate and doctoral students in conditions of digital transformation of science and education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840 (1), 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012057
Li, L., Peng, Z., Lu, L., Liao, H., & Li, H. (2020). Peer relationships, self-efficacy, academic motivation, and mathematics achievement in Zhuang adolescents: A moderated mediation model. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105358
Nikula, N., & Brazhaniuk, A. (2021). The Formation of the Future Specialist Professional Culture in the Educational Space of the University. LUMEN Proceedings, 16, 332-349. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/atee2020/22
Pekrun, R. (2021). Teachers need more than knowledge: Why motivation, emotion, and self-regulation are indispensable. Educational Psychologist, 56 (4), 312-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1991356
Rubtcova, M, & Pavenkov, O. (2019). Pedagogical Support of the Development of Humanitarian Competence of Students – Future Specialists in Public Relations. ACN- International Conference on Recent Developments in Social Science and Business Management (ICRDSSBM), Bangalore, Karnataka, India. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3319354
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Safin, R. S., Korchagin, E. A., Elizarova, V. A., Vildanov, I. E., Abitov, R. N., Kora, N. A., & Nigmetzyanova, V. M. (2015). Pedagogical conditions of students independent readiness formation for educational cognitive activity. Asian Social Science, 11 (4), 269-274. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n4p269
Santana-Monagas, E., Núñez, J. L., Loro, J. F., Huéscar, E. & León, J. (2022). Teachers’ engaging messages: The role of perceived autonomy, competence and relatedness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103556
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor: NFER-NELSON. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/selfscal.htm
Striguna, S. (2015). Essence of Self-Education Competence in Pedagogy. Santa Striguna. Essence of Self-Education Competence in Pedagogy, 1, 405-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2015vol1.308
Trolian, T. L., Jach, E. A. & Archibald, G. C. (2021). Shaping Students’ Career Attitudes toward Professional Success: Examining the Role of Student-Faculty Interactions. Innovative Higher Education, 46, 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09529-3
Yu, S., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2020). A Cross-Classified Path Analysis of the Self-Determination Theory Model on the Situational, Individual and Classroom Levels in College Education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101857
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nataliia Dymar, Kateryna Kruty, Iryna Desnova, Galyna Kondratska, Svitlana Yaremenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The authors retain their copyright but assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information as long as they mention the authorship of the work and that it was first published in this journal.
- Authors may make other independent or additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged and advised to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).