Impact of a group reflexivity on intellectual competence formation of students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v12i4.1241Keywords:
reflexive environment, group reflexivity, joint educational activity, reflexive abilities, intellectual indicators of IQ, intellectual competence.Abstract
This research analyses the problem of the group reflectivity influence on the intellectual competence formation. The dynamics of intellectual indicators in the joint educational activity of students in correlation with the development of reflexivity have been systematized. Empirical indicators of the reflexivity research were established using the methods of Karpov and Sharov; determination of self-knowledge indicators using the method of Leshinskyi, Kase; determination of intellectual potential indicators using the methods of Raven, Wexler, and Bruner. Reflexive-psychological influences (as a supplement to the traditional educational process) create corresponding interdependence with the level of intellectual abilities development. Special courses and practical training programs were developed by the author for forming the qualities of group reflexivity, personal abilities reflection, understanding of one’s professional future, readiness for change, one’s motives awareness, aspirations, sources of activity for further disclosure of personal reflective potential. The effectiveness of the programs of special courses training sessions concerning the formation of qualities of group reflexivity, reflexion of students’ abilities, understanding of their future professional career, readiness for change, awareness of motives, aspirations, sources of activity for the further development of personal reflexive potential has been experimentally proven.Downloads
References
Ackerman, P. L. (2018). Intelligence as potentiality and actuality. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of human intelligence (pp. 1-14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316817049.002
Alrubail, R. (2016). Scaffolding Student Reflections. Edutopia Community Facilitator. Student Voice & Literacy at The Writing Project, 12, 34-47. https://www.edutopia.org/discussion/scaffolding-student-reflections-sample-questions
Bloom, D. A. (2010). Taxonomy of Reflection: Critical Thinking For Students, Teachers, and Principals. American Journal of Psychology, 93, 17-36. https://peterpappas.com/2010/01/taxonomy-reflection-critical-thinking-students-teachers-principals.html
Carlton, L. (2013). The importance of student reflection. Academic press, 18, 25-34. https://thinkglobalschool.org/the-importance-of-student-reflection/
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological wellbeing across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
Dror, I. (ed.). (2007). Cognitive technologies and the pragmatics of Cognition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Filonenko, Y. (2005). A guide to the study of intelligence for adults by D. Veksler. St. Petersburg: IMATON.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34 (10), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Fu, N., Flood, P. C., Rousseau, D. M., & Morris, T. (2021). Resolving the individual helping and objective job performance dilemma: The moderating effect of team reflexivity. Journal of Business Research, 129, 236-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.058
Grünhut, Z. (2019). Reflexive Europe and the era of Late Modernity. Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, 7 (3), 42-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2019.3.03
Ivanova-Armeykova, R. (2020). On reflexive skills and competencies of the teachers. Education Journal, 9 (4), 99-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20200904.12
Karpov, A. V. (2004). Psychology of reflexive mechanisms of activity. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS.
Kember, D. (2008). Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Washington D. C.: American Psychological Association.
Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2004). A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43 (4), 268-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4304_4
Leshinsky, M., & Kase, L. (2021). Self-Knowledge Assessment. https://app.assessmentgenerator.com/assessment/12248
Martinez, M. E. (2006). What is metacognition? Phi Delta Kappan, 87 (9), 696-699. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170608700916
Nicol, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2), 199-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
Oh, M., & Choi, S. (2020). The competence of project team members and success factors with open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6 (3), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6030051
Psychology of a happy life. (2012). Test of thinking and creativity. Questionnaire Identification of types of thinking and level of creativity. Diagnosis by the method of J. Bruner. http://psycabi.net/testy/355-test-na-myshlenie-i-kreativnost-oprosnikopredelenie-tipov-myshleniya-i-urovnya-kreativnosti-diagnostika-po-metodu-dzhbrunera.
Raven, J. (1997). A guide to the Ravenna test. Standard Progressive Matrices. Moscow: Kohyto-Tsentr.
Schippers, M. C., Hartog, D. N., & Koopman, P. L. (2007). Reflexebility in Teams: A Measure and Correlates. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56 (2), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1464-0597.2006.00250.X
Semenov, Y. N. (2015). Reflexivity of self-observation and personology introspection: ontology and methodology of reflexive psychology of individuality. Bulletin of the MCU: Psychology, 3, 22-39. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/refleksivnost-samonablyudeniya-i-personologiya-introspektsii-k-ontologii-i-metodologii-refleksivnoy-psihologii-individualnosti
Sharov, A. S. (2000). Protected person: significance, activity, reflection: monograph. Omsk: Yzd-vo OmHPU.
Sharov, A. S. (2005). Ontology of reflections: nature, functions and mechanisms. Reflective processes and controls, 5 (1), 71–92. http://www.reflexion.ru/Library/J2005_1.pdf
Shmarkhun, V. M. (2013). Organization of mental assessment of intellectual competence features. Bulletin of the Chernihiv National Pedagogical University named after T.G. Shevchenko. Series: psychological sciences, 14, 208-212.
Sternberg, R. (2007). Critical thinking in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tjosvold, D., Tang, M. M. L., & West, M. (2004). Reflexibility for team innovation in China: The contribution of goal interdependence. Group and Organization Management, 5, 540-559. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/1059601103254911
Tobias, S., & Everson, H. T. (2002). Knowing what you know and what you don't: further research on metacognitive knowledge monitoring. College Board Research Report, 3.
Weick, K. E., & Putnam, T. (2006). Organizing for Mindfulness: Eastern Wisdom and Western Knowledge. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 275-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1056492606291202
West, M. A. (1996). Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 555-579). John Wiley.
Zammel, I. B., & Najar, T. (2021). Toward a conceptual framework of reflexivity and practices in knowledge management. Management Decision, 59 (12), 2809-2826. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2020-0428
Zhernovnykova, O. A., Nalyvaiko, O. O., & Chornous, N. A. (2017). Intellectual competence: essence, components, levels of formation. Pedagogy and psychology, 58, 32-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1116977
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Viktoriia M. Filipovych, Maryna V. Polenkova, Maryna E. Leshchenko, Yulia A. Demyanenko, Nataliia A. Yemets
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The authors retain their copyright but assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information as long as they mention the authorship of the work and that it was first published in this journal.
- Authors may make other independent or additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged and advised to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
