Satisfacción de los graduados universitarios con la calidad de la educación: aspectos específicos de los métodos de evaluación
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v12i2.1050Palabras clave:
Universidad, educación, estudiantes de posgrado, métodos, práctica investigadora.Resumen
El propósito del artículo es determinar la satisfacción de los graduados universitarios con la calidad de la formación en los programas educativos. La metodología de investigación se basa en las características de la calidad de la educación, que pueden expresarse en determinados indicadores cuantitativos. Tales características medibles incluyen evaluaciones cuantitativas tradicionales del nivel de conocimiento adquirido, indicadores cuantitativos de la demanda de especialistas graduados en el mercado laboral y el grado de satisfacción con la formación de los propios estudiantes. El estudio incluyó a 120 egresados del grupo ampliado de “Estudios culturales y diseño sociocultural” de los años 2018-2020. Se utilizaron los siguientes métodos: métodos de encuesta: cuantitativos (cuestionario) y cualitativos (entrevistas). La metodología propuesta y probada para medir la satisfacción de los egresados universitarios con los programas educativos puede convertirse en la base para el desarrollo de un sistema universitario de seguimiento de la medición de la satisfacción de los egresados universitarios con los programas educativos y un sistema de gestión de la calidad universitaria.
Descargas
Citas
Abramov, R. A., Pronina, I. V., & Khalatenkova, E. Y. (2016). Increasing the professional demand for university graduates. The Education and Science Journal, 10 (139), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-10-91-106
Anufrieva, N. I., Volkov, L. V., Aralova, E. V., Kolomyts, O. G., & Myagkova, E. V. (2020). Environmental education: nurturing of the humanistic orientation of a personality. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8 (11): 5529 - 5535. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081156
Avramkova, I. S., Anufrieva, N. I., Kamyanets, A. V., Kuznetsova, E., & Scherbakova, A. I. (2020). Socio-ecological foundations of intercultural communication studies of in the conditions of globalization. Revista Inclusiones, 7, Especial, 177-191. https://revistainclusiones.org/index.php/inclu/article/view/1154
Avramkova, I. S., Anufrieva, N. I., Kamyanets, A. V., Kuznetsova, E. O., & Scherbakova, A. I. (2021). Monitoring studies of university graduates’ satisfaction with the quality of education: the main approaches. Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, 25 (1), 638–653. https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/rpge/article/view/15004
Bespalova, E. D., & Zhirnova, E. A. (2015). The quality of education through the eyes of students. Reshetnevskie chteniia, 2, 463-465. https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?issueid=1523448
Blankenship, M. (2011). How social media can and should impact higher education. Education Digest, 76 (7): 39-42. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ919052
Bobrova, T. A. (2018). Sovremennaia sistema vysshego obrazovaniia Rossiiskoi Federatsii: osnovnye problemy i puti ikh resheniia [Modern system of higher education in the Russian Federation: the main problems and the ways to solve them]. Molodoi Uchenyi, 45 (231), 127-130. https://moluch.ru/archive/231/53422/
Bolotov, V. A., & Efremova, N. F. (2007). Sistema otsenki kachestva obrazovaniia: Uchebnoe posobie [The system for assessing the quality of education: Study guide]. Moscow: Logos.
Eliseeva, E. N. (2013). Otsenka udovletvorennosti potrebitelei obrazovatelnykh uslug na fakultete upravleniia [Assessment of satisfaction of consumers of educational services at the Faculty of Management]. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, 3 (294), 107-110. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-udovletvorennosti-potrebiteley-obrazovatelnyh-uslug-na-fakultete-upravleniya
Ermakova, Z. H. A., & Nikulina, I. U. N. (2017). Kachestvo obrazovaniia s pozitsii potrebitelei obrazovatelnykh uslug vuza [The quality of education from the perspective of consumers of educational services of a university]. Creative Economy, 11 (7), 726-735. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kachestvo-obrazovaniya-s-pozitsii-potrebiteley-obrazovatelnyh-uslug-vuza
Fatkulin, A. A. (2007). Sovremennoe obrazovanie: upravlenie, kachestvo, innovatsii: Uchebnoe posobie [Modern education: management, quality, innovation: study guide]. Vladivostok: Publishing house of the Far Eastern State Technical University.
Filippov, V. M., & Puzanova, Z. V. (2015). Quality of education: the possibilities of new approaches to assessment. Theory and practice of social development, 24, 12-15. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kachestvo-obrazovaniya-vozmozhnosti-novyh-podhodov-k-otsenke
Ginsburg, M. B. (1991). Understanding Educational Reform in Global Context: Economy, Ideology, and the State. New York: Routledge.
Gopal, R., Singh, V. & Aggarwal, A. (2021) Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1
Grace, B. Y., & Kim, J. -H. (2008). Testing the mediating effect of the quality of college life in the student satisfaction and student loyalty relationship. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 3 (1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-008-9044-8
Jehanzeb, K. & Bashir, N.A. (2013). Training and Development Program and its Benefits to Employee and Organization: A Conceptual Study. European Journal of Business and Management, 5 (2), 243-253. https://www.dcvmn.org/IMG/pdf/3947-5999-1-pb.pdf
Kennedy, M. M. (2016). Parsing the practice of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 67, 6-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115614617
Kotova, S. S., & Khasanova, I. I. (2016). The quality of the university educational process through the eyes of students. The Education and Science Journal, 9 (138), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-9-43-61
Kriukov, D. O. (2009). Education quality management system: concept, relevance, basic models and global trends. Psychology. Sociology. Pedagogy, 2 (1), 107-114. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sistema-menedzhmenta-kachestva-obrazovaniya-ponyatie-aktualnost-osnovnye-modeli-i-mirovye-tendentsii
Mikhalkina, E. V., & Gerasimova, O. Y. (2019). Satisfaction of university graduates with the quality of education in the context of digitalization. State and municipal management. Scholar notes, 4, 76-84. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2019-1-4-76-84
Miliaeva, L. G. (2016). Analiz uspeshnosti trudoustroistva vypusknikov vuzov v usloviiakh kompetentnostnogo podkhoda [Analysis of the success of the employment of university graduates in the context of the competency-based approach]. Upravlenie chelovecheskimi resursami. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management, 2.
Munteanu, C., Ceobanu, C., Bobâlca, C., & Anton, O. (2010). An analysis of customer satisfaction in a higher education context. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23 (2), 124-140. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551011022483
O'donovan, B. (2017). How student beliefs about knowledge and knowing influence their satisfaction with assessment and feedback. Higher Education, 74 (4), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0068-y
Reznik, G., & Savenkova, Y. (2009). Formation of a loyalty program as a factor in the competitiveness of a university. Problems of management theory and practice, 2, 83-92.
Rosstandart. (2019). Natsionalnyi standart Rossiiskoi federatsii sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva. Osnovnye polozheniia i slovar [National standard of the Russian Federation for quality management system. Fundamentals and vocabulary]. Moscow: Standartinform. http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200124393
Rusanova, A. A. (2005). Udovletvorennost kak pokazatel kachestva obrazovaniia v sovremennom vuze (iz opyta konkretnogo sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniia) [Satisfaction as an indicator of education quality in a modern university (from the experience of a specific sociological study)]. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Technical University. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/udovletvorennost-kak-pokazatel-kachestva-obrazovaniya-v-sovremennom-vuze-iz-opyta-konkretnogo-sotsiologicheskogo-issledovaniya
Sandler, D. G., Sushchenko, A. D., Kuznetsov, P. D., & Pechenkina, T. E. (2018). Trudoustroistvo vypusknikov i ego sviaz s kachestvom vysshego obrazovaniia [Employment of graduates and its relationship with the quality of higher education]. University management: practice and analysis, 22 (3), 73-83. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/trudoustroystvo-vypusknikov-i-ego-svyaz-s-kachestvom-vysshego-obrazovaniya
Shatskaya, I. (2021). Assessment of higher education organizations’ involvement in the process of scientific and technological development. Laplage Em Revista, 7 (2), 444-448. https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-6220202172766p.444-448
Shlykov, G. P. (2008). Sistema menedzhmenta kachestva universiteta [University quality management system]. Moscow: “NTK “Trek” Publishing House.
Simsek, U., Turan, I., & Simsek, U. (2017). Social studies teachers ‟and teacher candidates” perceptions on prompt feedback and communicate high expectations. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3 (1), 332, 345. https://www.grdspublishing.org/index.php/people/article/view/411
Sivakumar, R. (2019). Google form in education. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research and Innovations, 9 (1): 35-39. http://jceri.com/p_issues.php?issue=1&year=2019
Stepanova, M. M., & Chernenkaia, L. V. (2015). Student opinion poll as a tool for assessing customer satisfaction with the quality of education in the “Linguistics” master’s degree program. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal, 4 (232), 175-181. https://doi.org/10.5862/JHSS.232.21
Sushhenko, A. D., Kuznetsov, P. D., & Pechenkina, T. E. (2019). Measuring satisfaction with higher education among financially successful and unsuccessful graduates. Theory and practice of social development, 10 (140), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2019.10.4
Vasileva, E. I. U. (2008). Sistemnyi monitoring kachestva obrazovatelnoi sredy vuza [Systemic monitoring of the educational environment of the university (Northern state medical university)]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 3 (55), 2008. https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/view/809?locale=ru_RU
Vishnevskii, Y. R., & Narkhov, D. Y. (2019). Paradoxes of modernization of higher education: the results of 20 years of monitoring in the Sverdlovsk region. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 19 (2), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-2-289-301
Volovskaia, N. M., & Pliusnina, L. K. (2015). Vnutrennii sotsiologicheskii monitoring kachestva obrazovatelnoi deiatelnosti vuza [Internal sociological monitoring of the quality of educational activities of a university]. Theory and Practice of Social Development, 24, 16-18. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vnutrenniy-sotsiologicheskiy-monitoring-kachestva-obrazovatelnoy-deyatelnosti-vuza
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Elena I. Grigorieva, Elena Olegovna Kuznetsova, Tatiana Vitaljevna Pushkareva, Anna I. Scherbakova
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
1. Política propuesta para revistas de acceso abierto
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales) antes y durante el proceso de revisión y publicación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (veaThe Effect of Open Access).
