Validity evidence and invariance of the Mini - International Personality Item Pool (Mini-IPIP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v11i5.915Keywords:
Big-Five; personality; Mini-IPIP; IPIP-FFM; validityAbstract
There is a need for brief instruments on personality in the Peruvian context. Therefore, the objective of the study is to analyze the validity of the Mini - International Personality Item Pool (Mini-IPIP) and its factorial invariance. The method used was instrumental. The participants were 521 university students from a university in Lima. The instrument used was the Mini-IPIP, consisting of 20 items with five response options. Confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance was used through R studio software. The results showed that the final model (MF) obtained better fit rates than the other tested models (MP, M1 and M2). The extraction of items in the MF increased the reliability of the factors. Factorial invariance determined that there is no difference between gender. In conclusion, the MF is better suited to the reality of the Peruvian sample by obtaining higher values from goodness-of-fit indices.Downloads
References
Anicama, J., & Chumbimuni, A. (2018). Manual: Cuestionario breve de personalidad de los cinco grandes factores CBP. Fondo Editorial-CIPMOC.
Araujo, E. D. (2014). Cuestionario de personalidad situacional: estudio psicométrico y comparativo en adolescentes de Lima. Revista de Psicología, 16 (2), 139–151. http://revistas.ucv.edu.pe/index.php/R_PSI/article/view/250
Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29 (3), 1038–1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
Baldasaro, R. E., Shanahan, M. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2013). Psychometric Properties of the Mini-IPIP in a Large, Nationally Representative Sample of Young Adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95 (1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.700466
Blanken, T. F., Dekker, K., & Van Someren, E. J. W. (2018). How personality profile similarity can improve comparability between assessment formats: An example of the Mini-IPIP and IPIP-NEO-120 in a Dutch community sample. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pjtgv
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21 (2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
Burisch, M. (1997). Test length and validity revisited. European Journal of Personality, 11 (4), 303–315. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0984%28199711%2911%3A4%3C303%3A%3AAID-PER292%3E3.0.CO%3B2-%23
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56 (2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
Carretta, T. R., Ree, M. J., & Teachout, M. S. (2012). Measuring Personality in Business: The General Personality Factor in the Mini IPIP. American Journal of Management, 12, 81–87. http://na-businesspress.homestead.com/AJM/TeachoutMS_Web12_2__3_.pdf
Cassaretto, M. (2011). Relaciones entre la personalidad y el afrontamiento en estudiantes preuniversitarios. Revista Vanguardia Psicológica Clínica Teórica y Práctica, 1 (2), 202–225. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4815128
Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38 (4), 476–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054116
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9 (2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Choi, J., Fan, W., & Hancock, G. R. (2009). A Note on Confidence Intervals for Two-Group Latent Mean Effect Size Measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44 (3), 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170902938902
Cooper, A. J., Smillie, L. D., & Corr, P. J. (2010). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Mini-IPIP five-factor model personality scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 48 (5), 688–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.004
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources.
Czerwiński, S., & Atroszko, P. (2020). Scores of short and free scale for Big Five explain perceived stress at different stages of life: validity, reliability and measurement invariance of the Polish adaptation of Mini-IPIP. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8 (1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2020.95149
Dominguez-Lara, S. A. (2016). Evaluación de la confiabilidad del constructo mediante el coeficiente H: breve revisión conceptual y aplicaciones. Psychologia, 10 (2), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.21500/19002386.2134
Dominguez-Lara, S. A. (2018). Propuesta de puntos de corte para cargas factoriales: una perspectiva de fiabilidad de constructo. Enfermería Clínica, 28 (6), 401–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2018.06.002
Dominguez-Lara, S. A., & Merino-Soto, C. (2018). Dos versiones breves del Big Five Inventory en universitarios peruanos: BFI-15p y BFI-10p. Liberabit. Revista Peruana de Psicología, 24 (1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2018.v24n1.06
Dominguez-Lara, S. A., Merino-Soto, C., Zamudio, B., & Guevara-Cordero, C. (2018). Big Five Inventory en Universitarios Peruanos: Resultados Preliminares de su Validación. Psykhe (Santiago), 27 (2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.27.2.1052
Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18 (2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London University.
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44 (3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057198
Gastelumendi, C., & Oré, B. (2013). Personalidad y afrontamiento en voluntarios peruanos de lucha contra la pobreza. Revista de Psicología, 31 (1), 67–98. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201301.003
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2020). IBM SPSS Statistics 26: Step by Step. A Simple Guide and Reference (6ta ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 141–165). SAGE Publications.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4 (1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower level facets of several Five-Factor models. En I. Mervielde, I. J. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (7ma ed., pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37 (6), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
Hernández Muro, R. A. (2013). Relación entre las dimensiones de personalidad y la presencia de conductas de agresión en adolescentes varones de un colegio particular de Lima Metropolitana. Revista Psicológica Herediana, 8 (1–2), 32. https://doi.org/10.20453/rph.v8i1-2.2947
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory versions - 4a and 54. Institute of Personality and Social Research.
Jones, W. P. (2014). Enhancing a Short Measure of Big Five Personality Traits With Bayesian Scaling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74 (6), 1049–1066. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414525040
Laverdière, O., Gamache, D., Morin, A. J. S., & Diguer, L. (2020). French adaptation of the Mini-IPIP: A short measure of the Big Five. European Review of Applied Psychology, 70 (3), 100512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2019.100512
Laverdière, O., Morin, A. J. S., & St-Hilaire, F. (2013). Factor structure and measurement invariance of a short measure of the Big Five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 55 (7), 739–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.008
Leong, F. W., Mohd Yasin, M. A., Muhd Ramli, E. R., Fadzil, N. A., & Kueh, Y. C. (2019). Validation of the Malay Version of Mini-IPIP among Substance Use Disorder Patients Attending Methadone Clinics in Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (22), 4434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224434
Li, Z., Sang, Z., Wang, L., & Shi, Z. (2012). The Mini—IPIP Scale: Psychometric Features and Relations with PTSD Symptoms of Chinese Earthquake Survivors. Psychological Reports, 111 (2), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.2466/16.12.15.PR0.111.5.641-651
Martínez-Molina, A., & Arias, V. B. (2018). Balanced and positively worded personality short-forms: Mini-IPIP validity and cross-cultural invariance. PeerJ, 6 (9), e5542. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5542
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Instruments and Observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
Millon, T. (1997). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory III (MCMI III) (2nd ed.). National Computers Systems.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66 (6), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040291
Ock, J., McAbee, S. T., Mulfinger, E., & Oswald, F. L. (2020). The Practical Effects of Measurement Invariance: Gender Invariance in Two Big Five Personality Measures. Assessment, 27 (4), 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119885018
Oliveira, J. P. (2019). Psychometric Properties of the Portuguese Version of the Mini-IPIP five-Factor Model Personality Scale. Current Psychology, 38 (2), 432–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9625-5
Perry, L. M., Hoerger, M., Molix, L. A., & Duberstein, P. R. (2020). A Validation Study of the Mini-IPIP Five-Factor Personality Scale in Adults With Cancer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102 (2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1644341
Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17 (3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring Global Self-Esteem: Construct Validation of a Single-Item Measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27 (2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272002
Robins, R. W., Tracy, J. L., Trzesniewski, K., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2001). Personality Correlates of Self-Esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 35 (4), 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2001.2324
Rosas, A., Llanos, F., Mendoza, D., Contreras, C., & Huayta, E. (2001). Perfil de personalidad de estudiantes de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Revista de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 64 (1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.20453/rnp.v64i1.1480
Russell, J. A., Weiss, A., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1989). Affect Grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (3), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.493
Sánchez, H. H., & Reyes, C. (2015). Metodología y diseños en la investigación científica. Visión Universitaria.
Sarria-Joya, C., LLaja, V., García, P., & Salazar C., M. (2011). Validación del scanning neuropsicológico de la personalidad en estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Investigación en Psicología, 14 (1), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.15381/rinvp.v14i1.2086
Sibley, C. G., Luyten, N., Purnomo, M., Mobberley, A., Wootton, L. W., Hammond, M. D., Sengupta, N., Perry, R., West-Newman, T., Wilson, M. S., McLellan, L., Hoverd, W. J., & Robertson, A. (2011). The Mini-IPIP6: Validation and extension of a short measure of the Big-Six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40 (3), 142–159.
Simkin, H., Borchardt-Dutera, L., & Azzollini, S. (2020). Evidencias de validez del Compendio Internacional de Ítems de Personalidad Abreviado. Liberabit: Revista Peruana de Psicología, 26 (1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2020.v26n1.02
Topolewska, E., Skimina, E., Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., & Rowiński, T. (2014). The Short IPIP-BFM-20 Questionnaire for Measuring The Big Five. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 17 (2), 385–402. http://czasopisma.tnkul.pl/index.php/rpsych/article/view/3165
Vizcarra Fernández, M. Á., Llaja Rojas, V., Limo Sánchez, C., & Talavera Aguilar, J. (2015). Clima laboral, Burnout y Perfil de Personalidad: Un estudio en personal asistencial de un Hospital Público de Lima. Informes Psicológicos, 15 (2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.18566/nfpsicv15n2a06
Wielkiewicz, R. M. (2015). Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis of the Mini-IPIP with a multi-institutional sample of first- year college students. Psychology Faculty Publication, 5, 1–17. http://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/psychology_pubs/93
Wise, S. L., & DeMars, C. E. (2005). Low Examinee Effort in Low-Stakes Assessment: Problems and Potential Solutions. Educational Assessment, 10 (1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1001_1
Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Structural Equation Modeling with Robust Covariances. Sociological Methodology, 28 (1), 363–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00052
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Daniel Edgardo Yupanqui-Lorenzo, Víctor Pulido Capurro, Edith Olivera Carhuaz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The authors retain their copyright but assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information as long as they mention the authorship of the work and that it was first published in this journal.
- Authors may make other independent or additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged and advised to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
