Transformation of student-centred approach in the context of digitalisation of education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v11i4.776Keywords:
Student-centred approach, transforming education, digitalised education, digital technologies, educational technologies.Abstract
The aim of the article is to study the impact of digitalisation of education on the transformation of the student-centred approach. The study was conducted through a survey which was based on the questionnaire developed with the involvement of the international Erasmus+ MoPED project. The author identified the main range of issues that are of great concern to students in connection with the introduction of elements of digitalisation in the educational process. It was established that: most students do not trust the automated knowledge control system; most students expressed concern about the quality of digital teaching materials; most respondents expressed a willingness to take an active part in self-development and work on assignments in digital format. Thus, it was found that the student-centred approach is being transformed along with the digitalisation of the educational process. Further research in this direction may aim to identify more acceptable forms and methods of interaction between students and teachers on the basis of digital educational platforms to improve the quality of education and increase motivation to learn. The development of methods for transforming the student-centred approach in the use of digital learning platforms is also promising for further research.Downloads
References
Agibova, I. M. (2019). Fundamental education in university in development of future teachers' professional competences. In I. M. Agibova, & O. V Fedina (Eds.), European proceedings of social & behavioural sciences (pp. 249-259). Kazan, Russia: IFTE. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.01.31
Bicheva, I. B., & Filatova, O. M. (2018). Prospects of vocational training of teachers: axiological approach. The Bulletin of the Minin University, 6 (2), 3. https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2018-6-2-3
Bourque, C. J., & Bourdon, S. (2017). Multidisciplinary graduate training in social research methodology and computer-assisted qualitative data analysis: a hands-on/hands-off course design. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41 (4), 475-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1135882
Bukeikhanov, N. R., Gvozdkova, S. I., & Butrimova, E. V. (2020). Automated resource-saving system for the use and regeneration of epilam-based lubricating-cooling technological liquid. In A. Radionov, O. Kravchenko, V. Guzeev, & Y. Rozhdestvenskiy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE 2019) (pp 1435-1442). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Buzady, Z. (2017). Flow, leadership and serious games - a pedagogical perspective. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 14 (2/3), 204217. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-05-2016-0035
Cattik, M., & Odluyurt, S. (2017). The effectiveness of the smart board-based small-group graduated guidance instruction on digital gaming and observational learning skills of children with autism spectrum disorder. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16 (4), 84-102. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1160646
Cendon, E., & Gillen, K. (2016). Das Spannungsfeld zwischen Hochschule und Arbeitsmarkt - zur Rolle der Hochschuldidaktik [The tension between the university and the labor market - the role of university didactics]. http://wissenschaft-bildet.userblogs.uni-hamburg.de/forschungstagung‑2016/forschungstagung-abstracts‑2016/cendon-elsholz-gillen-kreutz/
Curaj, A., Deca, L. & Procopie, R. (Eds.). (2018). European higher education area: The impact of past and future policies, Volume 1. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319774060
De Wit, H. (2019). Evolving concepts, trends, and challenges in the internationalization of higher education in the world. Educational Studies Moscow, 2, 8-34. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2019-2-8-34
Demarle-Meusel, H., Sabitzer, B., & Sylle, J. (2017). The teaching-learning-lab: Digital literacy & computational thinking for everyone. In H. Demarle-Meusel, B. Sabitzer, & J. Sylle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU. Porto, Portugal. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006367001660170
Dewey, J. (1980) Democracy and education. In: J. A Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey. The middle works, 1899–1924. Volume 9: 1916 (pp. 1-370). Carbondale/Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. https://www.uio.no/studier/emner/uv/uv/UV9406/dewey-john-(1980).-democracy-and-education.pdf
Evans, L. (2018) Reshaping the EHEA: After the demise of neolibralism: A UK-Informed perspective. In A. Curaj, L. Deca, & R. Pricopie (Eds.), European higher education area: the impact of past and future policies (pp 23-42). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-77407-7_3
Evans, L., & Nixon, J. (2015). Academic identities in higher education: The changing European landscape. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
Gryaznova, E., Kozlova, T., & Sulima, I. (2018) Forming and realizing a pedagogue's philosophical culture. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, S2018, 2136-2142. https://doi.org/10.7456/1080SSE/287
Hibert, M., & Lesic-Thomas, A. (2017). On wolves, sheep and shepherds: on Bosnian comedy of errors. In W. Halffman & H. Radder (Eds.), International responses to the academic manifesto: reports from 14 countries. https://social-epistemology.com/2017/07/13/international-responses-to-the-academic-manifesto-reports-from-14-countries-willem-halffman-and-hans-radder/
Jones, A., & Bennet, R. (2017). Reaching beyond an online/offline divide: invoking the rhizome in higher education course design. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26 (2), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1201527
Klemenčič, M. (2017). From student engagement to student agency: Conceptual considerations of European policies on student-centered learning in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 30 (1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0034-4
Klemenčič, M. (2018). The student voice in quality assessment and improvement. In E. Hazelkorn, H. Coates, & A. McCormick (Eds.) Research Handbook on Quality, Performance and Accountability in Higher Education (pp. 332-343). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. New York, NY: Association Press.
Kusmin, M., Saar, M., & Laanpere, M. (2018). Smart schoolhouse – designing IoT study kits for project-based learning in STEM subjects. In C. Gonzalez, M. Castro, & M. Llamas (Eds.), Proceedings of the global engineering education conference (EDUCON). Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363412
Leask, B., Jones, E., & De Wit, H. (2018, December 7). Towards inclusive intercultural learning for all. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20181205093157690
Lundie, D. (2017). The givenness of the human learning experience and its incompatibility with information analytics. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49 (4), 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1052357
Maxwell, A. Jiang, Z., & Chen, C. (2017). Mobile learning for undergraduate course through interactive apps and a novel mobile remote shake table laboratory. https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/78/papers/18403/view
Piaget, J. (2004). The psychology of intelligence. Moscow, Russia: Piter.
Quarles, A. M., Conway, C. S., Harris, S. M., Osler II, J. E., & Rech, L. (2018). Integrating digital/mobile learning strategies with students in the classroom at the historical black college/university (HBCU). In Handbook of research on digital content, mobile learning, and technology integration models in teacher education (pp. 390-408). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Rogers, C. R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80’s. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill Publishing Company.
Rubinstein, S. L. (1999). The basics of general psychology: manual. St. Petersburg, Russia: Piter Kom.
Shagrova, G. (2019). Innovative approaches to the organization of students: independent learning in accordance with the digital economy requirements. In J. Rugelj, & M. Lapina (Eds.) Proceedings of SLET-2019 – International Scientic Conference Innovative Approaches to the Application of Digital Technologies in Education and Research. Stavropol, Russia: Dombay. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2494/paper_19.pdf
Sukhomlinsky, V. А. (1982). On upbringing. Moscow, Russia: Politicheskaya literatura.
Šušnjar, A., & Hovhannisyan, G. (2020). Bridging the policy-practice gap: Student-centered learning from the students’ perspective. In S. Hoidn, & M. Klemenčič (Eds.) The Routledge handbook on student-centered learning and instruction in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429259371
Wagenaar, R. (2019). Reform! Tuning the modernisation process of higher education in Europe. A blueprint for student-centred learning. Groningen, Netherlands: University of Groningen
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Alla A. Kharkivska, Olha V. Molchaniuk, Alona O. Prokopenko, Oksana O. Palchyk, Iryna V. Kadenko, Olena B. Borzyk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The authors retain their copyright but assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information as long as they mention the authorship of the work and that it was first published in this journal.
- Authors may make other independent or additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged and advised to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
