An educational methodology for studying culture as an organizing center in entrepreneurship development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v11i2.637Keywords:
methodology, culture, entrepreneurship, paradigm, mainstreamAbstract
This research is aimed at working out a systemic and holistic approach to entrepreneurship development, regarding the complex interaction of cultural and economic factors. The research objectives include proposing a new economic and cultural paradigm to study entrepreneurship and to substantiate the provision on the endogenous nature of the relationship between culture and business. The research hypothesis implies the assumption that economic culture should be considered as a supporting frame of a single economic reality, and entrepreneurial culture should be regarded as a backbone structure of entrepreneurial behavior models. The research methods are based on the analysis and comparison of the mainstream and alternative theories, within the framework of which ideas about entrepreneurial activity were formed. An alternative methodology was proposed that arose under the influence of the cognitive-cultural turn in the social sciences based on the complementarity of the structural-functional and communicative-semantic approaches. The conceptual meaning of this methodology is to clarify the role of culture as a backbone factor in the development of the entrepreneurial activity. The relevance of the study is determined by the change in the nature and mechanisms of entrepreneurial activities, the growing role of culture in the economy, and the lack of satisfactory theoretical and methodological approaches.Downloads
References
Afanasieva, M.V. (2010). Comparative analysis of the main approaches to the concept of business activity. Proceedings of the Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences, 1-2, 221-230. http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravnitelnyy-analiz-osnovnyh-podhodov-k-ponyatiyu-delovaya-aktivnos. (socionet.ru)
Akhmetshin, R., Gayazova, E. (2017). About the features of perception of social entrepreneurship in the world. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(4), 655-664. doi:10.7596/taksad.v6i4.1159.
Akhtyamov, M.K., and Likholetov, V.V. (2008). Integration of “waves” in the theory of enterprise and concepts of G.S. Altshuller and I.M. Vertkin’s theory of creative personality development. Russian Business, 4(2), 136-139. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n
Alesina, A. (2016). Review of political order and inequality: their foundations and their consequences by Carles Boix. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(3), 935-941. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.20151366
Alesina, A. and Giuliano, P. (2015). Culture and institutions. Journal of Economics Literature, 53(4), 898-944. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287387695
Alesina, A. and Giuliano, P. (2016). Culture and institutions. Part I. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 10, 82-111. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-10-82-111
Algan, Y. and Cahuc, P. (2004). Trust, growth, and well-being: New evidence and policy implications. In Aghion, Ph., Durlauf, S.N. (Eds.). Handbook of Economic Growth, V. 2A. Amsterdam and San Diego, pp. 49-120. North-Holland: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53538-2.00002-2
Ang, Z., Massingham, P. (2007). National culture and the standardization versus adaptation of knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 5-21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220363337
Atkin, D. (2016). The caloric costs of culture: evidence from Indian migrants. American Economic Review, 106(4), 1144-1181. https://docviewer.yandex.ru/view/213284733/
Barsbai, T., Rapoport, H., Steinmayr, A., Trebesch, C. (2017). The effect of labor migration on the diffusion of democracy: evidence from a former Soviet Republic. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(3), 36-69. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2327441
Berger, P. (1994). Capitalist Revolution: 50 theses on the prosperity, equality and freedom. Moscow: Progress-Universal. http://www.ejnew.org/?a=note&id=34627
Biryukov, V.V. (2017c). Economic behavior of business entities, culture, and institutions: Specifics of their interrelations in conditions of neo-industrialization. European Research Studies Journal, 20(4), 370-385. https://www.ersj.eu/dmdocuments/2017-xx-4-a-26.pdf
Biryukov, V.V. (2016). Valuable and rational behaviour and system and evolutionary paradigm of structuration of economy. The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal, 3(49), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2016-3(49)-119-132
Biryukov, V.V., Biryukova, V.V. (2010). Development of entrepreneurship and economic changes in the Russian industry: monograph. Omsk: SibADI. bek.sibadi.org/fulltext/EPD43.pdf
Biryukov, V.V., Romanenko, E.V. (2017a). Culture and institutional structuring of the economy. Espacios, 38(51), 6. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n51/17385106.html
Biryukov, V.V., Romanenko, E.V. (2017b). Culture and institutions in the evolutionary economy: conceptual approaches to analysis. Vestnik SibADI, 2(54), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.26518/2071-7296-2017-2(54)-151-158
Biryukov, V. (2018). Culturological paradigm of the perception of economic reality. Obshchestvo i ekonomika, 9, 91-101. doi:10.31857/S020736760001440-3
Boyer, P. and Petersen, M. (2012). The naturalness of (many) social institutions: Evolved cognition as their foundation. Journal of Institutional Economics, 8(1), 1-25. doi: 10.1017/S1744137411000300
Caroll, A.B. (1996). Business & society. Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati: South Western College Publishing.
Couto, J.P., and Vieira, J.С. (2004). National culture and research and development activities. Multinational Business Review, 12(1), 19-35. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org /4f17/2fb1a2919fcff54b2a0a19267121887ca5a9.pdf
Fernandez, R. (2008). Culture and economics. In Durlauf, S.N., Blume, L.E. (Eds.). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed., pp. 330-340. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. https://philpapers.org/rec/DURTNP-2
Fernandez, R. (2010). Does culture matter? In Benhabib, J., Jackson, M.O., Bisin, A. (Eds.). Handbook of Social Economics, V.1A, pp. 481-510. Amsterdam and San Diego: Elsevier. DOI 10.3386/w16277(http://www.nber.org/papers/w16277)
Frolov, D. (2016). Methodological institutionalism 2.0: from institutions to institutional configurations. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 7, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-7-147-160
Fukuyama, F. (2004). Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Moscow: AST, Ermak.
Geertz, C. (2004). The Interpretation of Cultures. Moscow: ROSSPEN.
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, I. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23-48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4981762
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, I. (2008). Social capital as good culture. Journal of European Economic Association, 6(2-3), 295-320. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w13712/w13712.pdf
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, I. (2009). Cultural biases in economic exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1095-1131. www.socialcapitalgateway.org/content/paper/
Hisrich, R. D., Brush, C. G. (1985). The Woman Entrepreneur: Starting, Financing and Managing a Successful New Business. Lexington, Mass., Lexington Books.
Hodgson, G. (2008). Institutions and Individuals: Interaction and Evolution. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 8, 45-60. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-8-45-60
Kayworth, T., Leinder, D. (2004). Organizational culture as a knowledge resource. In Holsapple C.W. (Eds.). Handbook on Knowledge Management 1: Knowledge Matters, pp. 235-252. Berlin: Springes-Verlag. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-24746-3_12
King, W.R. (2007). A research agenda for the relationships between culture and knowledge Management. Knowledge & Process Management, 14(3), 226-236. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229708027
Klamer, A.A. (2003). Pragmatic View on values in Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 10(2), 192-212. https://ru.scribd.com/doc/270069371
Kurniady, D.A., Komariah, A., Karnati, N. (2019). A heutagogy approach in pensioner entrepreneurship training. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 54(3). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.54.3.30
Lal, D. (2007). Unintended consequences. The effect of endowments of the factors of production, culture, and politics on long-term economic results. Moscow: IRISIN. https://www.litres.ru/dipak-lal
North, D. (1997). Institutions, institutional dimensions and economic performance. The Fund of economic book «Nachala», Moscow.
O’Hara, P. (2009). Contemporary principles of heterodox political economy. Issues of Economics, 12, 38-57. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-12-38-57
Romanenko, E.V., Rakhuba, L.F. (2018). Theory and Methodology of Small Business Development in an Innovative Economy. International Scientific Conference "Far East Con" (ISCFEC 2018). Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, Vladivostok, Russian Federation, 2-4 October, 2018. Paris: Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/iscfec-18.2019.186
Saubanov, K., & Nikolaev, M. (2018). Evolution of the content of the market category at different stages of its development. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7(4), 192-198. doi:10.7596/taksad.v7i4.1835.
Schumpeter, J. (1982). The theory of economic development. Moscow: Progress. https://institutiones.com/download/books/713
Schultz, W. (2001). The Moral Conditions of Economic Efficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz, M.S. and Weber, J. (2006). A business ethics national index (BENI): Measuring business ethics activity around the world. Business and Society, 45(3), 382-405. doi: 10.1177/0007650305285395
Staveren, I. (2009). Ethics of efficiency. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 12, 58-71. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-12-58-71
Tahir, D., Hattab, S., Mappatoba, M. (2020). Building public trust through service quality based on leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 55(3). http://jsju.org/index.php/journal/article/view/602
Williamson, J.G. (1965). Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development: a Description of the Patterns. Economic and Cultural Change, 13, 1-84. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/450136
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Elena V. Romanenko, Elena V. Yaluner, Anastasia S. Strinkovskaya, Michael M. Loubochkin, Anna Al. Kurochkina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The authors retain their copyright but assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information as long as they mention the authorship of the work and that it was first published in this journal.
- Authors may make other independent or additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged and advised to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
