Liberal Justice: Teleology and Worldview

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v9i3.385

Keywords:

Liberalism, Justice, Worldview, Modernity, Law.

Abstract

The philosophical and economic doctrine of the "Invisible Hand" was formulated by the Scottish philosopher Adam Smith (1723-1790), who is considered one of the greatest exponents of classical economics, as well as the father of political economy. His capital work is The Wealth of Nations. The main thesis of his work is that the key to social welfare lies in economic growth and this is enhanced by an adequate division of labor and competition between free, equal and relatively selfish human beings. Here we analyze how it emerged during Modernity, and even deepening in the last scholastic tracing in Ockham its remote origins, the liberal doctrine of rights and security, in definite accounts, the idea of justice and the worldview that sustains it. In the interregnum of both ages, it is not possible to avoid the convincing fact of the transformation of natural law into positive law and its impact on politics, sociology and economics. This school completes and applies mainly to contemporary economics and social theory with the theoretical outcome on the liberal theory of justice developed by John Rawls, especially between the years 1971-1995. We will dedicate ourselves to these connections and their criticism in what follows.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aranda Fraga, F. (1999). El corte epistemológico en la comprensión del origen de la sociedad política a partir de Thomas Hobbes, Estudios Filosóficos,138(XLVIII), 257-302.

Aranda Fraga, F. (2003). El lenguaje de la ciencia política moderna: Hobbes y el Nominalismo, Logos. Revista de Filosofía,XXXI(91), 23-50.

Aranda Fraga, F. (2005). Ockham: precursor medieval de la ética y la filosofía política modernas, Invenio,7(14), 11-30.

Aranda Fraga, F. (2009). La justicia política y sin fundamento metafísico de John Rawls, in Oliveira, N. de y Gonzaga de Souza, D. Justiça global e democracia: homenagem a John Rawls (161-172).Porto Alegre: ediPUCRS.

Boucher & Kelly, eds. (1994). The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls. New York: Routledge.

Hobbes, T. (1966). Leviathan. Or the Matter, Forme and Power of A Common Wealth Ecclesiastical and Civil. EW, III, ed. Sir William Molesworth, Second Reprint. London: Scientia Verlag Aalen.

Hobbes,T. (1969). The Elements of Law Natural and Politic, ed. Ferdinand Tönnies and Introduction by M. M. Goldsmith. New York: Barnes & Nobles.

Kohn, C. (1996). El Leviatán: fin de la historia de la sociedad de mercado, EnfoquesVIII(1), 40-48.

Ockham, W. (1974-2002). Opera politica. Vols. I-VI. Manchester: Manchester University Press-Harper & Row Publishers.

Ockham, W. (1992). A Short Discourse on the Tyrannical Government, ed. A. S. McGrade, trad. John Kicullen. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rawls, J.(1971). A Theory of Justice, 21th edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical, Philosophy and Public Affairs,14, 223-251.

Rawls, J. (1988). The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good, Philosophy and Public Affairs,17, 251-276.

Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press

Rawls, J. (1999). The Idea of Public Reason Revisited, in The Law of Peopleswith “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press.

Tierney, B. (1996). The Crisis of Church and State 1050-1300.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Tierney, B. (1997). The Idea of Natural Rights. Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law and Church Law 1150-1625. Atlanta: Scholars Press.

Published

2019-07-26

How to Cite

Aranda Fraga, F. (2019). Liberal Justice: Teleology and Worldview. Apuntes Universitarios, 9(3), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v9i3.385