Psychological characteristics of students' perception of innovation in the training process

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v13i1.1321

Keywords:

innovation, perceptual mechanisms, personality traits, initiative and management

Abstract

In this research, the psychological issues of the perception of innovations of students from different specialties were studied through various methods and questionnaires. 162 students studying at different universities and having different professional directions participated in the research.  The study showed that if the preferred innovations in education are related to the introduction of new technologies, this factor for society is related to the presence of high wages and acceptable working conditions. It was concluded that a number of personality traits, including initiative and practicality, play an important role in the perception of innovations. However, in the process of accepting innovation, risk-taking and psychological preparation that allows to perceive innovations are the main leading elements. The study showed that there are differences in the process of perception of innovation between students with high and low academic achievement, and these differences are significant at the p ≤ 0.01 level. For students with high practical activities and academic abilities, innovation acceptance is characterized by practical and entrepreneurial styles, and for students with high academic and practical abilities, the leading perception aspect is characterized by practical and managerial qualities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akalın, Sh. A. (2007). Innovation, innovation: Innovation. Journal of Turkish Language, Language and Literature, 93 (666), 483-486. https://¬turko¬loji.cu¬.edu.-tr/20SORUNLARI/sukru_haluk_akalin_inovasyon_yenilesim.pdf

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior.Organ. Behav.Hum.Decis.Pro-cess., 50 (2): 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing: In 2 books. Ed. K. M. Gurevich, V. I. Lubovsky. Book.1. http://elcat.pnpu.edu.ua/docs/%D1%81.pdf

Aliyev B. H., & Jabbarov R. V. (2008). The problem of personality in education. Baku. https://lsu.edu.az/new/LSU-Library/lb/Student_/psychology.php

Belousova, A. K. (2002). Self-organization of joint mental activity. Rostov-on-Don, Russian State Pedagogical University. https://www.dissercat.com/content/samoorganizatsiya-sovmestnoi-myslitelnoi-deyatelnosti

Bagozzi, R. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst.Online, 8 (4): 244-254.https://cit¬eseerx.ist¬.psu.edu¬/vie-wdoc¬/¬download?doi=10.1.1.361.5863&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Baynev, V. F. (2007). Innovative management of the university as a factor in ensuring its competitiveness. Belarusian Economic Journal, 4 (1) : 81.https:/¬/www.¬elibrary¬.ru/it¬em.-asp?¬id=27260589

Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer techno¬logy:¬ a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci., 35 (8): 982-1003 https://¬doi.org/-10.¬128¬7/mnsc.35.8.982

Demirci, A. E. (2012), Key Concepts, Innovation Management, Ed: Cevahir Uzkurt and Ahmet Emre Demirci. Eskişehir: Anadolu University Publishing. https://d¬ocp-layer.biz.tr/1133488-T-c-anadolu-universitesi-yayini-no-2602-acikogretim-fakultesi-yayini-no-1570-yenilik-yonetimi-yazarlar-yrd-doc-dr-ahmet-emre-demirci-unite-1.html

Eroshin, V. I. (1996). Modern economic situation in education. Pedagogy, 5 (1):. 55-59. https://www.dissercat.com/content/ekonomicheskiemy-vysshego-obrazovaniya

Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, İ. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: an Int¬rodu¬ction to Theory and Research. , Massachussetts: Addison-Wesley. https://¬people.umass¬.edu/-aizen¬/f&a1975.html

Furler, E. (2013). Personality similarity and life satisfaction in couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 47: 369-375

Fouka, G. & Mantzorou, M. (2011). What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? Is there a conflict between the research ethics and the nature of nursing? Health Science Journal, 5 (1), 3-14. https://www.coursehero.com/file/p7fptdr/Fouka-G-Mantzorou-M-2011-What-are-the-major-ethical-issues-in-conducting

Gedranovich, B. A.(2006). Educational activity of a higher educational institution: innovative methods of management. Minsk. https://¬elib.bsu¬.by/bit¬stream/1¬2345¬6789/-11013/1/AO_15_2009.pdf

Grevenstein, D. & Bluemke, M. (2015) Can the Big Five explain the criterion validity of Sense of Coherence for mental health, life satisfaction, and personal distress? Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 106-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.053

Gorghiu, G., Anghel, G. A., & Ion, R. (2015). Students’ perception related to a responsible research and innovation demarche. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, The 6th International Conference Edu World 2014: Education Facing Contemporary World Issues, November 7 – 9, 600-605. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.166.

Ilyin, E. B. (2004). Motivation and motives. SPB: Peters. ¬https://¬www.¬academ¬ia.¬edu/¬4305¬26-248B

Ilyina, N. A. (1985). Attitude to innovations in production teams. Cand. dis.Лeninqrad. https://studizba.com/lectures/psihologiya/organizacionnaya-psihologiya

Innovation management (2001). Textbook. Ed. L.N. Ogolevoy. M.: İnfra-M. https://socioline.ru/pages/l-ogoleva-innovatsionnyj-menedzhment

Kovalenko, E. M. (2011). Innovative educational technologies and their implementation at the university. http:// www. universitys. ru/j/images/stories/nir/10/kovalenko. pdf/

Jabbarov R., Valiyeva Y., Nasirova N. & Kazımova, K. (2020) The creation of fee¬dback in training as a mobilizing fac¬tor for the cognitiveactivity of students. Revista de Inve¬st¬ig¬a-ción Apuntes Un¬iv¬e¬r¬si¬tarios, 10 (3):207-221 https://ap¬untesu¬niversitarios¬.upeu.ed-u.pe/index¬.php/reva¬pun¬tes/¬article/view/481/556

Krasovsky, Y. D. (2003). Organizational behavior. M.: Unıty-Dana. https://¬ruco¬nt-.ru/efd/352390

Sazonov, B.V. (1980). Activity approach to innovation. Social factors of innovations in organizational systems. Moscow: Delo. http://www.lab1-3.narod.ru/page5.html

Kelchevskaya, N. R. (2004). Formation of an innovative strategy for the development of educational institutions in the “university-enterprise” system: Yekaterinburg. https://-eprin¬ts.oa.edu.ua/7180/1/27.pdf

Keengwe, T., Kidd, L. & Kyei-Blankson (2009). Faculty and technology: implications for faculty training and technology leadership J. Sci. Educ. Technol., 18 (1): 23-28 https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.484.9652&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Kroz, M. V. (1988). Socio-psychological characteristics of the innovative installation. Psychological Journal, (9),2. https://nauka-pedagogika.com/psihologiya-19-00-07/disser¬tac¬iya-professionalnye-ustanovki-v-deyatelnosti-pedagogov

Khabaeva L. M., Abaeva I. V., Gioeva, E. P. (2015). Problems of development achievement motivation among student youth of north Ossetia. Modern problems of science and education, 1 (1), 56-66. https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=17893

Markov, A. V. (2005). State innovation policy: theoretical foundations and implementation mec¬hanism. Law and Economics. Minsk. https://cyberle¬ninka.ru/a¬rticle¬/n/kakoy-byt-natsio¬na¬lnoy-innovatsionnoy-sisteme-belarusi

Mustyatsa, A. G. (2009). The mechanism of formation and implementation of innovative strategies of industrial enterprises: world experience and Russian practice. Moscow https://www.dissercat.com/content/mekhanizm-formirovaniya-i-realizatsii-innovatsionnykh-strategii-promyshlennykh-predpriyatii

Meade N. & Islam T. (2006). Modelling and forecasting the diffusion of innovation–A 25-year review. Int. J. Forecast, 22 (3): 519-54. https://www.sc¬ienced¬irect¬.com/s¬cien¬ce/art-icle/abs/pii/S016920700600019

Manika, D. (2021). How Pride Triggered by Pro-environmental Technology Adoption Spills Over into Conservation Behaviours: A Social Business Application Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172 (9), 121005. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.12100

Methodology for diagnosing the degree of readiness for risk by Schubert (2018). The psychology of a happy life. https://psycabi.net/testy/273-metodika-diagnostiki-stepeni-goto¬vnosti-k-riskushubert-test-sklonnosti-k-risku-shuberta

Maksyanova, T. V. (2010). Features of the implementation of open innovative technologies in the system of higher professional education. Innovations, 07 (141): 63-66. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-realizatsii-otkrytyh-innovatsionnyh-tehnologiy-v-sisteme-vysshego-professionalnogo-obrazovaniya

Molchanova, E. L. (2005). Thinking styles of successful and unsuccessful managers. Graduation 16. qualifying work. Rostov-on-Don. https:/¬/www.researchgate.net › publication

Onwuegbuzie, A., Leech, N. L., Slate, J. R., Stark, M., Sharma, B., Frels, R. & Combs, J. P. (2012). An exemplar for teaching and learning qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 17 (1), 16-77. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR17-1/onwuegbuzie.pdf

Pasmurtseva, N. N. (2008). Formation and implementation of an innovative strategy for the development of an enterprise: on the example of metallurgical production and the production of finished metal products in the Sverdlovsk region. Ekaterinburg. https://-www.¬diss¬ercat.com/content/formirovanie-i-realizatsiya-innovatsionnoi-strategii-razvitiya-predpriyatiya-na-primere-meta

Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Electron. Commer., 7 (3) : 101-134 https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275

Gugueva, Z. S. (2000). Thinking style of employees of the organization with different labor motivation. Final qualifying work, Rostov-on-Don.http://jour.vsu.¬ru/editions/¬journals/-ves¬tnik_filology/2018_3_vestnik.pdf

Rakovskaya, O. L. (2012). Innovative strategies for the development of the educational process. Bulletin of Higher School, 10, 61-64. https://istina.¬msu.ru/jou¬rnals/975¬93/?p=7

Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A. & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. An integrated approach to communication theory and research. London: Routledge. https://¬www.¬tayl-orfrancis.c¬om/cha¬pters/edit/10.4324/9780203710753-35

Roberts, R., Flin, R. (2020). Unlocking the Potential: Understanding the Psychological Factors That Influence Technology Adoption in the Upstream Oil and Gas Industry. SPE Journal, 25 (1): 515-528 https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631105

Sovetova, O. S. (2000). Fundamentals of social psychology of innovation. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg University. https://www.¬dissercat.com/c¬ontent/-sotsial¬naya-¬psikhologiya-innovatsii-osnovaniya-issledovaniya-problemy

Santo, B. (1990). Innovation as a means of economic development. Moscow: Progress. https://www.ozon.ru/product/innovatsiya-kak-sredstvo-ekonomicheskogo-razvitiya

Suldo, S., Minch, D. R. & Hearon, B. V. (2014). Adolescent life satisfaction and personality characteristics: Inv¬est¬igating relationships using a five factor model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1-19. Doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9544-1

Tatarinova, L. V., Rerke, V. I. & Bubnova, I. S. (2019). Revista Espacios, 40 (33). 6-12. http://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n33/19403306.html

Tereshchenko, V. M. (2001). Marketing: New technologies in Russia. SPb: Piter. https://www.libex.ru/detail/book471734.html

Titov, A. B. (2001). Marketing and innovation management. SPb.: Piter. https://alta-irbook.com/books/117044-marketing-i-upravlenie-innovaciyami.html

Venkatesh,V., Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model:four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci., 46 (2): 186-204. https://d¬oi.org/¬10.1-287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Weinbaum, C., Landree, E., Blumenthal, M. S., & Gutierrez-Gaviria, C. I. (2019). Ethics in Scientific Research: An Examination of Ethical Principles and Emerging Topics. Santa Monica. https://ww¬w.rand.¬org/¬pubs/¬resear¬ch_¬repo¬rts/¬RR2912.html.

Jankowski, K. P. (2001). Organization of investment and innovation activities Mukhar: Piter. http://opac.¬hse.ru/absopac/app/webroo¬t/index.php?url=/notices/i¬ndex¬/IdNo¬tic¬-e:30391/Source:default

Published

2022-12-02

How to Cite

Verdiyeva, T. . (2022). Psychological characteristics of students’ perception of innovation in the training process. Apuntes Universitarios, 13(1), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v13i1.1321