Humanistic and utilitarian purposes of higher education in the context of the competence approach: Presentation of a problema
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v12i4.1242Keywords:
competence-based education, educational philosophy, higher education, key competencies, soft skills, universityAbstract
The purpose of this article is to examine the tension that exists between the main purposes of higher education, humanistic and utilitarian, through the competency-based approach. The main conclusions of the theoretical study, based on structural-functional and system-genetic approaches, are that this tension can be removed through introducing universal competences (the Russian alternative to key competences, soft skills), that due to their specificity, they can perform utilitarian, humanistic, integrating and balancing functions of learning. Also, upbringing and self-upbringing (intellectual, value-based and existential development, respectively) in the universalizing matrix of culture reproduction; they can transfer features of classical university education (the humanistic focus and universalism) into a specialized institute education, facilitating their convergence. However, the competence approach-based perspective of two central purposes of education, while overcoming the artificial dichotomy between them, still remains instrumental rather than autotelic.Downloads
References
Anderson-Levitt, K., & Gardinier, M. P. (2021). Introduction contextualizing global flows of competency-based education: Polysemy, hybridity and silences. Comparative Education, 57(1), 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/03050068.2020.1852719
Baidenko, V. I. (2006). The Bologna process: Problems, experience, solutions. Moscow: Research Center for Quality Problems of training specialists.
Barnett, R. (2012). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 65-77. DOI:10.1080/07294360.2012.642841
Barnett, R. (2018). The Thinking University: Two Versions, Rival and Complementary. In S. Bengtsen & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Thinking University. Debating Higher Education: Philosophical Perspectives (vol. 1, pp. 185-198). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77667-5_13
Bauman, Z. (1995). From Pilgrim to Tourist – or a Short History of Identity. Sociological journal, 4, 133-154. https://www.isras.ru/index.php?page_id=2384&id=218&l=&printmode
Bergan, S. (2019). The European Higher Education Area: A Road to the Future or at Way’s End? Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 6 (2), 23-49. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-6(2)-2019pp23-49
Biesta, G. (2014). Cultivating humanity or educating the human? Two options for education in the knowledge age. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev., 15, 13-19. DOI:10.1007/s12564-013-9292-7
Biesta, G. (2015). Teaching, Teacher Education, and The Humanities: Reconsidering Education as a Geisteswissenschaft. Educational Theory, 65 (6), 665-679. DOI:10.1111/edth.12141
Biesta, G. (2019). What is the educational task? Arousing the desire for wanting to exist in the world in a grown-up way. Pedagogía y Saberes, 50, 51-61. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0121-24942019000100051>
Biesta, G. (2020). Risking Ourselves in Education: Qualification, Socialization, and Subjectification Revisited. Educational Theory, 70 (1), 89-104. DOI:10.1111/edth.12411
Biesta, G. (2021). The three gifts of teaching: Towards a non-egological future for moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 50 (1), 39-54. DOI:10.1080/03057240.2020.1763279
Binkovskaya, L. N., & Maltsev, K. G. (2021). The strange ‘death of the university’: Experience in philosophical interpretation. Society: Philosophy, history, culture, 4 (84), 21-26. DOI: 10.24158/fik.2021.4.2
Boulter, S. (2017). Education from a Biological Point of View. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36, 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9509-4
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: MIT Press. ISBN: 978-1935408536
Cekić, N. (2018). Utilitarianism and the Idea of University: A Short Ethical Analysis. Filozofija i Drustvo – Philosophy and society, 29 (1), 73-87. DOI:10.2298/FID1801073C
Clark, B. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organization Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: International Association of Universities and Elsevier Science Ltd. ISBN: 0-08-0433545; 0-08-0433421
Collini, S. (2012). What Are Universities For? London: Penguin Books.
Dalbosco, C. A., & Doro, M. J. (2019). Ontologia da formação pós-humanista em Heidegger e Foucault. ETD: Educação Temática Digital, Campinas, SP, 21 (1), 63-83. DOI:10.20396/etd.v21i1.8650840.
Decker, D. (2019). Student Perceptions of Higher Education and Apprenticeship Alignment. Education Sciences, 9 (2), 86, 1-14. DOI:10.3390/educsci9020086
Delors, J., & UNESCO. (1996). Learning, the treasure within: Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century by International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris: Unesco Pub. https://archive.org/details/learningtreasure0000inte
Derrida, J. (1992). The Other Heading: Reflections on Today's Europe. Indiana University Press.
Donskikh, O. A., & Logunova, L. Y. (2019). Teacher and Pupil: Happiness of Interaction. Higher Education in Russia, 28 (4), 60-71. DOI:10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-4-60-71
Drobotenko, Y. B. (2021). Universal competencies as a methodological basis of higher education standards. Bulletin of the Kazakh National Pedagogical University named after Abai, 2 (70), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.51889/2021-2.1728-5496.03
Durkheim, E. (1984). The Division of Labour in Society. New York: The Free Press.
Dyachkova, M. A., Novgorodtseva, A. N., & Tomyuk, O. N. (2020). Humanitarization of technical university education: Effective strategies and practices. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania – Perspectives of Science and Education, 47 (5), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2020.5.5
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Social Science Information, 42, 293-337. DOI:10.1177/05390184030423002
Expósito, C. D. (2020). La quimera de una educación sin valores. Apuntes Universitarios, 10 (4), 175-188. DOI: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5314-9752
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things. An archeology of the human sciences. New York: Random House.
Fryer, D. R. (2004). The intervention of the other. Ethical subjectivity in Levinas and Lacan. New York, NY: Other Press.
Gerrard, H. (2017). Skills as Trope, Skills as Target: Universities and the Uncertain Future. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 52 (4), 363-370. DOI:10.1007/s40841-017-0084-1
Gilyazova, O. (2022). Competence-based education and the concept of universal competences: Dialectics of their pros and cons. Proceedings of the 16th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED2022), 8665-8670. DOI:10.21125/inted.2022.2249
Gilyazova, O. S., & Zamoshchansky, I. I. (2022). Specific features of universal competences of higher education in Russia in the context of competence-based education: Conceptual analysis. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania – Perspectives of Science and Education, 56 (2), 77-94. DOI:10.32744/pse.2022.2.5
Habermas, J., & Blazek, J. R. (1987). The Idea of the University: Learning Processes. New German Critique, 41, 3-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/488273
Hinchliffe, G. (2006). Graduate Employability and Lifelong Learning: A Need for Realism? In P. Hager (Ed.). Graduate Attributes, Learning and Employability (pp. 91-104). Netherlands: Springer. DOI:10.1007/1-4020-5342-8_5
Hurrell, S. A. (2016). Rethinking the soft skills deficit blame game: Employers, skills withdrawal and the reporting of soft skills gaps. Human Relations, 69 (3), 605-628. DOI:10.1177/0018726715591636
Hutchins, R. M. (1953). The University of Utopia. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Hutchins, R. M. (1955). The Great Conversation. The Substance of a Liberal Education. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica.
Jääskelä, P., Nykänen, S., & Tynjälä, P. (2018). Models for the development of generic skills in Finnish higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42 (1), 130-142, DOI:10.1080/0309877X.2016.1206858
Jaspers, K. (1959). The idea of the university. Boston: Beacon Press. https://books.google.ru/books/about/The_Idea_of_the_University.html?hl=ru&id=e0RWxgEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Kayumov, O. R. (2017). About the Purposes and Ideals of Education Applying the ‘Competence Approach.’ Ideas and Ideals, 1 (4)/34, 95-104. DOI:10.17212/2075-0862-2017-4.1-95-104
Kerr, C. (2001). The Uses of the University (5° ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kislov, A. G., & Shmurygina, O. V. (2012). The university idea: Retrospection, versions and prospects. The Education and Science Journal, 8, 96-121. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17962841
Kislov, A. G., & Shmurygina, O. V. (2013). Forthcoming Plans for Institutional Transformation of Russian Higher Education. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences, 6 (3), 438-454. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18883151
Kochetkov, M. V., & Avdeeva, E. A. (2021). Humanitarian reversing higher education in the Russian Federation in light of the transhumanist challenges. Philosophical Forum, 52 (2), 103-114. DOI:10.1111/phil.12288
Kozyrev, M., Jukova, E., Palekhova, P., Shumarov, A., & Faizulin, R. (2022). State control (supervision) and the regulatory guillotine in the field of higher education in the Russian Federation. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, 15 (34), e17220. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v15i34.17220
Kukkola, J. (2016). What are Universities for? In P. Siljander, K. Kontio & E. Pikkarainen (Eds.), Schools in Transition (pp. 53-63). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-827-3_4
Kukkola, J., & Pikkarainen, E. (2017). Edusemiotics, Existential Semiotics, and Existential Pedagogy. In I. Semetsky (Ed.), Edusemiotics – A Handbook (pp. 121-135). Singapore: Springer,. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1495-6_9
Kuzminov, Y. I., & Yudkevich, M. M. (2021). Universities in Russia: How It Works. Moscow: HSE.
López, M. V. (2019). Sobre el estudio: ocio, melancolía y cuidado. Teoria de la educacion. Revista Interuniversitaria, 31 (2), 69-86. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/teri.21145
Lovetsky, G. I., Samylov, P. V., & Kosushkin, V. G. (2022). Future of university in conditions of uncertainty and complexity. Higher education in Russia, 31 (5), 102-117. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-5-102-117
Luque Mengíbar, D., & López-Gómez, E. (2018). Metáforas de la educación universitaria. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 30 (2), 247-266. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/teoredu302247266
MacAllister, J. (2016). What should Educational Institutions be for? British Journal of Educational Studies, 64 (3), 375-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1131811
MacIntyre, A. (2009). The very idea of a university: Aristotle, Newman, and us. British Journal of Educational Studies, 57 (4), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2009.00443.x
Maltseva, V. (2021). What is Wrong with the Concept of Job Readiness in Higher Education? Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya-Journal of Economic Sociology, 22 (2), 109-138. DOI:10.17323/1726-3247-2021-2-109-138
Marin-Zapata, S. I., Román-Calderón, J. P., Robledo-Ardila, C., & Jaramillo-Serna, M. A. (2022). Soft skills, do we know what we are talking about? Review of Managerial Science, 16, 969-1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00474-9
McCowan, T. (2017). Higher education, unbundling and the end of the university as we know it. Oxford Review of Education, 43 (1), 1-16. DOI:10.1080/03054985.2017.1343712
Naval, C., Villacís J. L., & Ibarrola-García, S. (2022). The Transversality of Civic Learning as the Basis for Development in the University. Education Sciences, 12 (4), 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040240
Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 0-521-80763-8; 0-521-61472-4
Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OECD. (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030. Conceptual Learning Framework. Concept Note: Transformative Competencies for 2030. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1932). The revolt of the masses (Authorized translation from the Spanish). London: George & Allen Unwin Ltd. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.217843/page/n9/mode/2up.
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1974). Mission of the University (H. L. Nostrand, Trans. and ed.). New York: Norton.
Pluzhnirova, E. A., Zhivoglyad, M. V., Kulagina, J. A., Morozova, I. M., & Titova, N. V. (2021). Formación de habilidades blandas en estudiantes de instituciones de educación superior. Revista Eduweb, 15 (1), 112-122. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2021.15.01.10
Polonnikov, A. A. (2022). On the mission of humanitarian education in higher technical school. Higher education in Russia, 31 (4), 79-91. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-4-79-91
Readings, B. (1996). The University in Ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rumayor, M. (2019). John Henry Newman y su idea de la universidad en el siglo XXI. Educación XX1, 22 (1), 315-333. DOI:10.5944/educXX1.20088
Rybin, V. A. (2009). The idea of university of the 21st century. The first part. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk state university, 42 (180), 15, 171-179. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14999198
Rychen D. S. (2016). E2030 conceptual framework: Key competencies for 2030 (DeSeCo 2.0). https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/about/documents/E2030-CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK-KEY-COMPETENCIES-FOR-2030.pdf
Säfström, C. A. (2019). Paideia and the search for freedom in the educational formation of the public of today. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 53 (4), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12385
Säfström, C. A. (2021). El potencial ético-político del presente educativo: principio aristocrático versus principio democrático. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 33 (1), 11-33. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.22894
Schelsky, H. (1971). Einsamkeit und Freiheit: Idee und Gestalt der deutschen Universität und ihrer Reformen. Düsseldorf: Bertelsmann Universitätsverlag.
Schleicher, A. (2018). Educating Learners for Their Future, Not Our Past. ECNU Review of Education, 1 (1), 58-75. DOI:10.30926/ecnuroe2018010104
Shutaleva, A. V., Kerimov, A. A., & Tsiplakova, Y. V. (2019). Humanization of education in digital era. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania – Perspectives of Science and Education, 42 (6), 31-43. DOI:10.32744/pse.2019.6.3
Smith, A., & Webster, F. (1997). The postmodern university? Contested visions of higher education in society. Buckingham: Open Univ. Press.
Star, C., & Hammer, S. (2008). Teaching generic skills: Eroding the higher purpose of universities, or an opportunity for renewal? Oxford Review of Education, 34 (2), 237-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054980701672232
Strogetskaya, E. V., Miletskiy, V. P., & Betiger, I. B. (2019). The Differentiation of Russian Universities in the Conditions of the Higher Education Institutional Crisis. Proceedings of the Middle-Term Conference RC04 Sociology of Education International Sociological Association (ISA), 298-305. DOI:10.22363/09669-2019-298-305
The Yale Report. (1828). Part 1: Liberal Education and Collegiate Life. A Committee of the Corporation and the Academic Faculty. https://collegiateway.org/reading/yale-report-1828/
Tkach, D. S. (Ed.). (2014). The Classical University: Challenges of Time and Ways of Development. Krasnodar: Parabellum. ISBN: 978-5-904423-89-6
Tomyuk, O., Shutaleva, A., Dyachkova, M., Fayustov, A., & Novgorodtseva, A. (2019). University Positioning in Modern World. Proceedings of the Internation Conference on ‘Humanities and Social Sciences: Novations, Problems, Prospects’ (HSSNPP 2019), 641-645. DOI:10.2991/HSSNPP-19.2019.122
Trilling, B., & Fadel, Ch. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 9780470475386; 0470475382; 9781118157060; 1118157060
Ushakov, D. V. (2019). Russian-Mongolian Educational Cooperation: From Models to Implementation (part II). Philosophy of Education, 19 (1), 111-126. DOI:10.15372/PHE20190109
Vaganova, O. I., Bulaeva, M. N., Meteleva, L. A., Popkova, A. A., & Vezetiu, E. V. (2020). Portfolio as an educational technology in the educational process of a university. Amazonia Investiga, 9 (25), 356-361. https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/1080
Velden, R. van der & Verhaest, D. (2017). Are Skill Deficits Always Bad? Toward a Learning Perspective on Skill Mismatches. Skill Mismatch in Labor Markets. In S. Polachek, K. Pouliakas, G. Russo & K. Tatsiramos (Eds.), Research in Labor Economics (vol. 45, pp. 305-343). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Ltd. DOI:10.1108/S0147-912120170000045009
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (E. Fischoff et al., Trans.). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Wissema, J. (2009). Towards the Third Generation University: Managing the University in Transition. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Yampolskaya, L. I. (2014). Conceptualization of the classical ‘idea of a university’ in a non-classical variant. Tomsk: STT. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22947175
Yarygin, O. N., Maseleno, A., Akhmetov, L. G., Korostelev, A. A., & Andino Maseleno (2019). Modeling of competence as a tool of purpose setting for education in modern society. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7 (6), 72-77. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41625628
Zavaley, A. (2014). Philosophy of Education: An Overview of Contemporary Foreign Literature. Educational studies. Moscow, 2, 238-257. DOI:10.17323/1814-9545-2014-2-236-255
Zhao, K. (2020). Educating for Wholeness, but beyond Competences: Challenges to Key-Competences-Based Education in China. ECNU Review of Education, 3 (3), 470-487. DOI: 10.1177/2096531120935463
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Olga S. Gilyazova, Ivan I. Zamoshchansky, Anna N. Zamoshchanskaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The authors retain their copyright but assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information as long as they mention the authorship of the work and that it was first published in this journal.
- Authors may make other independent or additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged and advised to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
