Psychological conditions for the effectiveness of distance education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v12i2.1046Keywords:
Cognitive component, distance education, motivational component, motivational exercises, reflective reports, operational activity component, reflective component.Abstract
The article deals with the psychological conditions that affect distance education in high school. The following methods were used: psychological and educational pedagogical experiment, test, observation, percentage trend analysis, Student's t-test. The independent variable of the experiment is the motivational exercises and the reflective reports of the distance courses, and the dependent variable is the professional competence of the research participants. 212 applicants to the Master's educational level participated in the study: 102 people in the control sample and 110 people in the experimental sample. The calculation of the Student's t-test confirmed the importance of all the transformations detected. The study demonstrates the importance of the psychological conditions created to improve the effectiveness of distance education. The results of the study can be used as a basis for specialized psychological training programs for teachers who teach distance education courses. Other perspectives for research on the problem are to study the impact of the psychological state of teachers on the effectiveness of distance education, as well as to compare the results of the introduction of certain psychological conditions in traditional and distance education.Downloads
References
Agung, A. S. N., Surtikanti, M. W., & Quinones, C. A. (2020). Students’ perception of online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A case study on the English students of STKIP Pamane Talino. Soshum: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 10, 225-235. https://doi.org/10.31940/soshum.v10i2.1316
Albrahim, F. A. (2020). Online teaching skills and competencies. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19 (1), 9-20. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1239983.pdf
Bao, W. (2020). COVID ‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2 (2), 113-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.19132510042
Czerniewicz, L., Trotter, H., & Haupt, G. (2019). Online teaching in response to student protests and campus shutdowns: Academics’ perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16 (43), 1-22. https://doi. org/10.1186/s41239-019-0170-1
Chiu, T. K. F., Lin, T.-J., & Lonka, K. (2021). Motivating online learning: The challenges of COVID-19 and beyond. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30, 187-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00566-w
Chornous, V. (2020). Main criteria and rates of the competence formation for pedagogical students. Topical Issues of Humanities, 31 (4), 232-237. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863.4/31.214390
Fathelrahman, A. (2019). Using reflection to improve distance learning course delivery: A case study of teaching a management information systems course. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 34 (2), 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1508338
Fedosenko, E. V. (2020). Life after quarantine: meaning psychology and coronavirus COVID-19. In G. A. Vaizer, T. A. Popova and N. V. Kiselnikova, (Eds.), Psychological problems of the meaning of life and Acme: Electronic collection of materials of the XXIV international symposium (pp. 34-37). Moscow, Russia: Institute of the Russian Academy of Education.
Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyk, O., & Lencastre, J.-A. (2020). Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, Art. 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2
Garip, G., Seneviratne, S. R., & Iacovou, S. (2020). Learners’ perceptions and experiences of studying psychology online. Journal of Computers in Education, 7, 553-573. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s40692-020-00167-4
Hartnett, M. (2016). Motivation in online education. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0700-2_2
Havrilova, L., & Katasonova, Y. (2017). Theoretical aspects of launching the distance learning in Ukraine. Educational Discourse, 1-2, 16-17. https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2017.1-2.1682
Hsu, H. C. K., Wang, C. V., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2019). Reexamining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24 (3), 2159-2174. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1213250
Irawan, A.-W., Dwisona D., & Lestari, M. (2020). Psychological impacts of students on online learning during the pandemic COVID-19. KONSELI: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling (E-Journal), 7 (1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.24042/kons.v7i1.6389
Jung, I., Omori, S., Dawson, W.P., Yamaguchi, Т., & Lee, S.J. (2021). Faculty as reflective practitioners in emergency online teaching: An autoethnography. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Art. 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00261-2
Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching, 23 (4), 387-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016
Kucherenko, N. (2018). Distance learning as a challenge of the modern university education: Philosophic and legal dimension. Bulletin of the National University “Lviv Polytechnic”. Series: Legal Sciences, 906, 34-40. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vnulpurn_2018_20_8
Lister, K., Seale, J., & Douce, C. (2021). Mental health in distance learning: A taxonomy of barriers and enablers to student mental wellbeing. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 36 (2). (Ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1899907
Martin, A. (2020, March 16). How to optimize online learning in the age of coronavirus (COVID-19): A 5-point guide for educators. https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/social-affairs/how-optimise-online-learning-age-coronavirus
Meşe, E., & Sevilen, Ç. (2021). Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: A qualitative case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 4 (1), 11-22. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jetol/issue/60134/817680
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8 (422), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Prybylova, V. M. (2017). Problems and advantages of distance learning in the higher educational institutions of Ukraine. Problems of Modern Education (UA), 4, 27-36. https://periodicals.karazin.ua/issuesedu/article/view/8791
Ritter, J.K. (2020). The educational self as a starting point for understanding and self-study in teaching and teacher education. Teacher Education and Practitioner Research (Advances in Research on Teaching), 34, 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-368720200000034008
Simpson, O. (2018). Supporting students in online, open and distance learning. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203417003
Smulson, M. L. (Ed.). (2012). Distance learning: The psychological basis. Monograph. Kirovograd, Ukraine: Imex Ltd.
Starosta, V. (2019). Pedagogic analysis. Methodical materials for practical classes and independent work of students. Uzhhorod, Ukraine: Sabov A. M.
Sujarwo, S., Sukmawati, S., Akhiruddin, A., Ridwan, R., & Siradjuddin, S. S. S. (2020). An analysis of university students’ perspective on online learning in the midst of COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 53, 125-137. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v53i2.24964
Sukmawati, S., & Nensia, N. (2019). The role of Google classroom in ELT. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1 (2), 142-145. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i2.1526
Thandevaraj, E. J., Azizah, N. N. G., & Khalid, M. M. N. (2021). A review of psychological impact on students online learning during Covid-19 in Malaysia. Creative Education, 12 (6), 1296-1306. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.126097
Tull, S., Dabner, N. & Ayebi-Arthur, K. (2017). Social media and e-learning in response to seismic events: Resilient practices. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 21 (1), 63-76. Distance Education Association of New Zealand. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/180237/.
Watts, L. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning: A review of the literature. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17 (1), 23-32. https://www.proquest.com/openview/f83c30d3f7e7d1cd69754d1fa52eaff5/1
Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty perceptions about teaching online: Exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning, 21 (1), 15-35. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Faculty-Perceptions-about-Teaching-Online%3A-the-the-Wingo-Ivankova/8b48e115ea966275facee818b2ccead77e35ee8c
Wong, T., Xie, H., Zou, D., Wang, F. L., Tang, J. K., Kong, A., & Kwan, R. (2019). How to facilitate self-regulated learning? A case study on open educational resources. Journal of Computers in Education, 7 (1), 51-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00138-4
Yakubu, M. N., & Dasuki, S. I. (2019). Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning technologies among higher education students in Nigeria: A structural equation modeling approach. Information Development, 35, 492-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666918765907
Yeh, Y., Kwok, O., Chien, H., Sweany, N. W., Baek, E., & Mcintosh, W. (2019). How college students’ achievement goal orientations predict their expected online learning outcome: The mediation roles of self-regulated learning strategies and supportive online learning behaviors. Online Learning, 23 (4), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.2076
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Oleksandr V. Zinchenko, Andrii V. Sherudylo, Anna V. Zhuravel, Iryna V. Mozul, Oleksandr V. Ihnatenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The authors retain their copyright but assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published information as long as they mention the authorship of the work and that it was first published in this journal.
- Authors may make other independent or additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are encouraged and advised to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).