Analogía del derecho en la práctica educativa del derecho civil

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v11i1.544

Palabras clave:

analogía jurídica, derecho civil, ley, justicia, legislación, jurisprudencia.

Resumen

El objetivo de esta investigación fue mostrar cuán activamente se aplica el mecanismo de analogía legal en la práctica actual del derecho civil, identificando las razones del papel principal de la analogía legal como herramienta activa en el proceso de administración de justicia. El método de analogía fue considerado como la herramienta clave del objeto del estudio, y junto con los instrumentos jurídicos y técnicos comparativos especiales, el autor aplicó métodos lógicos generales que son característicos de los estudios más civilizados, como el análisis y síntesis, inducción y deducción, comparación y generalización. Además, el autor definió algunos casos importantes que se decidieron mediante la aplicación de analogías legales y pueden constituir la base para futuras investigaciones en el desarrollo de la práctica judicial pertinente. En este sentido, el aporte del autor consiste en un nuevo concepto de la correlación entre el desarrollo y el desglose de los estándares legales y el grado de demanda de analogía legal en la jurisprudencia.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

Albov, A.P. (2013). Cultural norms of as the law source and form. Modern Lawyer, 4, 54-65. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20388062

Alieskerov, M. (2002). Procedural analogy in civil process. Russian Justice, 3, 18-20. http://base.garant.ru/5116996/

Andreev, V.K. (2020). Dynamics of Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Russian Law, 3, 58-68. DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2020.030

Anisimov, V. F. (2016). A small opinion in a big discussion. Russian judge, 6, 56-57. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26254834

Arkhipov, V.V, Naumov, V. B. (2017). On some issues of the theoretical foundations of the development of legislation on robotics: aspects of will and legal personality. Law, 5 157-170. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29144841

Balashov, A.N., Mishutina, E.I. (2009). The issues of the analogy of law and the legal analogy application in civil process. Russian Justice, 10, 59-62. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13025821

Bevzenko, R.S. (2010). The application of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Yurayt

Bogdanova E.E., Maleina M.N., Ksenofontova D.S. (2020) Certain Problems of Citizens' Rights Protection when Using Genomic Technologies. Lex russica, 5, 129-142. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2020.162.5.129-142

Bondarenko, N.L. (2013). The modern methodological approach to the principles of civil law study. Bulletin of Perm University. Juridical sciences, 4, 305-309. http://www.jurvestnik.psu.ru/index.php/ru/vypusk-4222013

Braginsky, M.I., Vitryansky, V.V. (2001). Contract law. General Provisions. Moscow: Statut.

D'amato, A. (2010). Legal Uncertainty. Northwestern Public Law Research, Paper No. 10-79. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1707826

Damele, G. (2014). Analogia Legis and Analogia Iuris: An Overview from a Rhetorical Perspective. Argumentation Library, 25, 243-256. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06334-8_14

Davis, K.E. (2011). The Concept of Legal Uncertainty. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1990813

Demin, A.V. (2017). Discretion in Tax Law. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. Issue 35. Pp. 42-55. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2945965.

Diogenes, L. (1979). On the life, teachings and sayings of famous philosophers. Myisl, Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Institute of Philosophy.

Erokhova, M.A. (2014). Commentary to the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation of April 4, 2014 N 22 On Certain Issues of Money Judgment to the Recoverer for Non-Execution of a Judicial Act. Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, 6, 32-53.

Ferrari, F., Bocharova, N. (2015). The astreinte in the Italian and Russian Administrative (Judicial) and Civil Proceedings. Russian Law Journal, 3, 9-45. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2015-3-3-8-45

Golubtsov, V.G. (2016). The Principle of Good Faith as an Element of the Legal Mechanism for Stimulating the Debtor to Proper Execution of Obligations and Guaranteeing Creditors’ Interests: Analysis of Judicial and Arbitration Practice. Juridical Sciences, 32, 175-184. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-32-175-184

Hunter, D. (2008). Teaching and Using Analogy in Law. Journal of the Association of Legal Writing Directors, 2. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1089669

Ioffe, O. S. (2004). Selected Works. St. Petersburg.

Koszowski, M. (2017). Analogical Reasoning in Statutory Law. Journal of Forensic Research, 8. DOI: 10.4172/2157-7145.1000372

Kulakov, V.V. (2013). Basic principles of civil law as a special form of law. Bulletin of Perm University. Juridical sciences, 4, 185-192. http://www.jurvestnik.psu.ru/index.php/ru/vypusk-4222013

Kuznetsova, O.A. (2006). Direct (immediate) impact of civil law principles. Notary, 1, 37-39.

Laptev, V.A. (2015). Court decisions as part of judicial practice: application of the law and the principle of justness. Arbitration and civil procedure, 10, 28-33. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24350970

Laptev, V.A. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Liability for its Work. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2, 79-102. DOI: 10.17-323/2072-8166.2019.2.79.102

Luneva, E. (2015). The Trends in Development of Methodology of Scientific Cognition of Civil Legal Reality. Juridical Sciences, 3(29), 117-124. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2015-3-117-124

Macagno, F., Walton, D. (2009). Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 42(2), 154-182. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1742956

Maleina, M.N. (2019). The role of legal principles in eliminating and minimizing the risks of genomic technologies implementation. Lex russica, 8, 121-128. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.153.8.121-128

Malyushin, A.A. (2015). Constitutional and judicial lawmaking (rights establishment) in the Russian Federation as a special form of modern lawmaking. Russian Justice, 10, 6-8. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24336861

Mikryukov, V.А. (2017). Limits of Analogy in the Mechanism of Judicial Reduction of Property Sanctions. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 5(27), 1563-1575. https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/1715

Panova, I.V. (2012). Judicial process in the context of Russian legal culture. Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, 1, 74-84. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17215172

Plato. (2006). Works in four volumes. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg University.

Polyakov, D.N. (2014). General ways of overcoming gaps in civil law. Bulletin of the Omsk Law Academy, 2(23), 54. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21545844

Raban, O. (2010). The Fallacy of Legal Certainty: Why Vague Legal Standards May Be Better for Capitalism and Liberalism. Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 19(175). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1419683

Romanenko D. (2017) Legal Nature of Gaps in Anglo-American Common Law, Civil Law, 3, 40-42. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29322903

Rovny, V.V. (2011). Civil Law. Guide book in 3 vols. Moscow: RG Press.

Schauer, F., Spellman, B.A. (2017). Analogy, Expertise, and Experience. University of Chicago Law Review, 84(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3064100

Shindyapina, E.D., Boshno, S.V. (2006). Correlation of legal analogy and the analogy of law. Lawyer, 7, 6-9.

Sizemova, O.B. (2015). About regulatory sources in the mechanism of legal regulation of interbank payments. Banking law, 4, 35-41. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23772275

Slepenkova, O.A. (2011). Some aspects of the application of civil law principles in judicial practice. Russian Justice, 9, 4-6.

Szabo, I. (1964). Socialist law. Moscow: Progress.

Taylor, G. (2009). Law and Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tsikhotsky, A.V. (2011). Institute of analogy in the mechanism of overcoming law gaps. Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Law, 2, 67-74 https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17105162

Ulyanov, A.V. (2014). Good faith in civil law. Russian Law Journal, 6, 133-140.

Vaipan, V.A. (2017). Fundamentals of the legal regulation of the digital economy. Law and Economics, 11, 5-18.

Van Gestel, R., Micklitz, H.-W., Rubin, E.L. (2017). Rethinking Legal Scholarship: A Transatlantic Dialogue. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2644088

Veter, N.Y. (2015). To the issue of the concept of the evasion of law. Power of the Law, 1, 155-165. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24355585

Volkov, A.V. (2010). Formalism against subjectivity in civil law. Modern Law, 1, 35-39.

Weinreb, L. (2005). Legal reason: The use of analogy in legal argument. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316597774

Publicado

2020-10-20

Cómo citar

Mikryukov, V. . (2020). Analogía del derecho en la práctica educativa del derecho civil. Apuntes Universitarios, 11(1), 36 -46. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v11i1.544