circumstances in international documents is reasonable and standard. For International
Documents: Article 33 of the United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods
(CISG) International Trade Contracts (UPICC), Article 107-27 of the European Treaty Law
(PECL) and Article 102-22 of the DCFR Common Framework of Reference). After concluding
the contract, considering all its essential terms and conditions, for any reason, deliberately or
unintentionally, one of the parties may refuse to execute the contract on the pretext that the contract
is unenforceable, and the civil law seems silent. It does, and there is no explicit solution to our
civil law, despite the stipulation in international documents.
Keywords: Iranian law, international trade, civil law, legal time, Iran
Introduction
Whether in domestic or international law, because of negligence or willful or because of
the complexity and sophistication of the legal relations of the successors, many of the requirements
relating to obligations, including the time when the obligation is enforced, are vague and uncertain,
However, the contract really has the essentials of authenticity and is a formed word. Or by custom,
the will of the parties is to create a perfect contract (Khorsandian and Nasripour, 2014).
Most of the jurisprudents consider the unknown time to be null and void, so the opinions
of the jurists are examined in this article. The two most important articles on the subject matter
are: 1- Paragraph 2 of Article 233 BC; As for the unknown condition that ignorance causes
ignorance to transgressors, the unknown time must be considered void. 2. Article 401 of the Civil
Law on option stipulates that “if the stipulation is not fixed for option, both the cucumber condition
and the nullity condition are invalid” (Tusi, 2018: 161).
In international documents, the principle is about the fulfillment of the obligation in case
the contract is ambiguous and ambiguous, in this respect the matter has been brought into
conformity with our civil law and domestic law. But the stage of contract formation seems to be
separate from the stage of implementation, and the stage of implementation should not have any
relation to the elements of the contract and ultimately to the contract to the extent that whatever
the interlocutors intend and this intention and will is achievable and transmit the contract
(Bozorgmehr, 2017). Invalid, so you must look for another rule unless the runtime is a
commitment. In addition, it has been tried to present and respond to the case by analyzing the case
(Katouzian, 2007). So, there are issues of the day that are related to lawyers, lawyers, judges, legal
and real estate consultants as well as those involved in such cases. Finally, it should be noted that
in this article, the view of jurists, legal scholars, and then in the international documents on the
Revista de Investigación Apuntes Universitarios
ISSN 2312-4253(impresa)
ISSN 2078-4015(en línea)